Literature DB >> 19191885

Distinguishing iron-reducing from sulfate-reducing conditions.

Francis H Chapelle1, Paul M Bradley, Mary Ann Thomas, Peter B McMahon.   

Abstract

Ground water systems dominated by iron- or sulfate-reducing conditions may be distinguished by observing concentrations of dissolved iron (Fe(2+)) and sulfide (sum of H(2)S, HS(-), and S(=) species and denoted here as "H(2)S"). This approach is based on the observation that concentrations of Fe(2+) and H(2)S in ground water systems tend to be inversely related according to a hyperbolic function. That is, when Fe(2+) concentrations are high, H(2)S concentrations tend to be low and vice versa. This relation partly reflects the rapid reaction kinetics of Fe(2+) with H(2)S to produce relatively insoluble ferrous sulfides (FeS). This relation also reflects competition for organic substrates between the iron- and the sulfate-reducing microorganisms that catalyze the production of Fe(2+) and H(2)S. These solubility and microbial constraints operate in tandem, resulting in the observed hyperbolic relation between Fe(2+) and H(2)S concentrations. Concentrations of redox indicators, including dissolved hydrogen (H(2)) measured in a shallow aquifer in Hanahan, South Carolina, suggest that if the Fe(2+)/H(2)S mass ratio (units of mg/L) exceeded 10, the screened interval being tapped was consistently iron reducing (H(2) approximately 0.2 to 0.8 nM). Conversely, if the Fe(2+)/H(2)S ratio was less than 0.30, consistent sulfate-reducing (H(2) approximately 1 to 5 nM) conditions were observed over time. Concomitantly high Fe(2+) and H(2)S concentrations were associated with H(2) concentrations that varied between 0.2 and 5.0 nM over time, suggesting mixing of water from adjacent iron- and sulfate-reducing zones or concomitant iron and sulfate reduction under nonelectron donor-limited conditions. These observations suggest that Fe(2+)/H(2)S mass ratios may provide useful information concerning the occurrence and distribution of iron and sulfate reduction in ground water systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19191885     DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00536.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ground Water        ISSN: 0017-467X            Impact factor:   2.671


  5 in total

1.  Molecular analysis of spatial variation of iron-reducing bacteria in riverine alluvial aquifers of the Mankyeong River.

Authors:  So-Jeong Kim; Dong-Chan Koh; Soo-Je Park; In-Tae Cha; Joong-Wook Park; Jong-Hwa Na; Yul Roh; Kyung-Seok Ko; Kangjoo Kim; Sung-Keun Rhee
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.422

2.  Performance assessment of laboratory and field-scale multi-step passive treatment of iron-rich acid mine drainage for design improvement.

Authors:  Tsiverihasina V Rakotonimaro; Carmen Mihaela Neculita; Bruno Bussière; Thomas Genty; Gérald J Zagury
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Functional microbial diversity explains groundwater chemistry in a pristine aquifer.

Authors:  Theodore M Flynn; Robert A Sanford; Hodon Ryu; Craig M Bethke; Audrey D Levine; Nicholas J Ashbolt; Jorge W Santo Domingo
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.605

4.  Labile organic carbon regulates phosphorus release from eroded soil transported into anaerobic coastal systems.

Authors:  Jouni Lehtoranta; Petri Ekholm; Stella Wahlström; Petra Tallberg; Risto Uusitalo
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  The Effect of Drying/Re-Flooding on Trace Metal, As and Se Fluxes in a Treatment Wetland: Addressing Growing Environmental Concerns.

Authors:  Drew J Hansen; Alex J Horne
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.