Literature DB >> 19191782

Derivatives of prostate-specific antigen as predictors of incidental prostate cancer.

Michael Froehner1, Lena Marie Buck, Rainer Koch, Oliver W Hakenberg, Manfred P Wirth.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To search for an optimal derivative of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) identifying patients at risk of incidental prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 693 patients who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) with a normal digital rectal examination, no history of prostate cancer and a PSA level of 2.5-10 ng/mL were studied. The total PSA (tPSA), percentage of free/total PSA (%fPSA), complexed PSA (cPSA), PSA density, cPSA density and the ratio of fPSA to cPSA were measured. Specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values were determined for all possible threshold values indicating the risk of incidental prostate cancer (T1a or T1b). Furthermore, the patients were subdivided according to age and the presence of an indwelling transurethral catheter. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were compared. RESULTS In the whole sample, the %fPSA was the best test predicting all incidental prostate cancers (AUC 0.618, reference: tPSA 0.494), whereas cPSA density was the best predictor of T1b disease (AUC 0.720, reference: tPSA 0.548). Stratification by age did not meaningfully alter the results, the presence of a transurethral catheter, however, was associated with a superiority of tests based on fPSA (AUC 0.620-0.670) compared with tests based on tPSA or cPSA (AUC 0.421-0.581). CONCLUSION Replacing tPSA by PSA derivatives (%fPSA or cPSA density) and stratifying by the presence of an indwelling transurethral catheter may improve the prediction of the risk of incidental prostate cancer and spare unnecessary biopsies before TURP in the tPSA range 2.5-10 ng/mL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19191782     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08349.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  4 in total

1.  An improved prognostic model for stage T1a and T1b prostate cancer by assessments of cancer extent.

Authors:  Ramzi Rajab; Gabrielle Fisher; Michael W Kattan; Christopher S Foster; Henrik Møller; Tim Oliver; Victor Reuter; Peter T Scardino; Jack Cuzick; Daniel M Berney
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Preoperative clinical factors for diagnosis of incidental prostate cancer in the era of tissue-ablative surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a korean multi-center review.

Authors:  Changhee Yoo; Cheol Young Oh; Se Joong Kim; Sun Il Kim; Young Sig Kim; Jong Yeon Park; Do Hwan Seong; Yun Seob Song; Won Jae Yang; Hyun Chul Chung; In Rae Cho; Sung Yong Cho; Sang Hyeon Cheon; Sungjoon Hong; Jin Seon Cho
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-06-19

3.  PSA density improves the rate of prostate cancer detection in Chinese men with a PSA between 2.5-10.0 ng ml (-1) and 10.1-20.0 ng ml (-1) : a multicenter study.

Authors:  Yu-Rong Lin; Xing-Hua Wei; Matthew Uhlman; Xuan-Ting Lin; Si-Feng Wu; Peng-Fei Diao; Hai-Qing Xie; Ke-Ji Xie; Ping Tang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Using clinical parameters to predict prostate cancer and reduce the unnecessary biopsy among patients with PSA in the gray zone.

Authors:  Junxiao Liu; Biao Dong; Wugong Qu; Jiange Wang; Yue Xu; Shuanbao Yu; Xuepei Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.