Literature DB >> 19191501

Combined effects of scaffold stiffening and mechanical preconditioning cycles on construct biomechanics, gene expression, and tendon repair biomechanics.

Victor Sanjit Nirmalanandhan1, Natalia Juncosa-Melvin, Jason T Shearn, Gregory P Boivin, Marc T Galloway, Cynthia Gooch, Gino Bradica, David L Butler.   

Abstract

Our group has previously reported that in vitro mechanical stimulation of tissue-engineered tendon constructs significantly increases both construct stiffness and the biomechanical properties of the repair tissue after surgery. When optimized using response surface methodology, our results indicate that a mechanical stimulus with three components (2.4% strain, 3000 cycles/day, and one cycle repetition) produced the highest in vitro linear stiffness. Such positive correlations between construct and repair stiffness after surgery suggest that enhancing structural stiffness before surgery could not only accelerate repair stiffness but also prevent premature failures in culture due to poor mechanical integrity. In this study, we examined the combined effects of scaffold crosslinking and subsequent mechanical stimulation on construct mechanics and biology. Autologous tissue-engineered constructs were created by seeding mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from 15 New Zealand white rabbits on type I collagen sponges that had undergone additional dehydrothermal crosslinking (termed ADHT in this manuscript). Both constructs from each rabbit were mechanically stimulated for 8h/day for 12 consecutive days with half receiving 100 cycles/day and the other half receiving 3000 cycles/day. These paired MSC-collagen autologous constructs were then implanted in bilateral full-thickness, full-length defects in the central third of rabbit patellar tendons. Increasing the number of in vitro cycles/day delivered to the ADHT constructs in culture produced no differences in stiffness or gene expression and no changes in biomechanical properties or histology 12 weeks after surgery. Compared to MSC-based repairs from a previous study that received no additional treatment in culture, ADHT crosslinking of the scaffolds actually lowered the 12-week repair stiffness. Thus, while ADHT crosslinking may initially stiffen a construct in culture, this specific treatment also appears to mask any benefits of stimulation among repairs postsurgery. Our findings emphasize the importance of properly preconditioning a scaffold to better control/modulate MSC differentiation in vitro and to further enhance repair outcome in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19191501      PMCID: PMC2792106          DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  32 in total

1.  Autologous mesenchymal stem cell-mediated repair of tendon.

Authors:  H A Awad; D L Butler; G P Boivin; F N Smith; P Malaviya; B Huibregtse; A I Caplan
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  1999-06

2.  Cell orientation response to cyclically deformed substrates: experimental validation of a cell model.

Authors:  H Wang; W Ip; R Boissy; E S Grood
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Effect of physical crosslinking methods on collagen-fiber durability in proteolytic solutions.

Authors:  K S Weadock; E J Miller; E L Keuffel; M G Dunn
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1996-10

4.  Effects of cell-to-collagen ratio in mesenchymal stem cell-seeded implants on tendon repair biomechanics and histology.

Authors:  Natalia Juncosa-Melvin; Gregory P Boivin; Marc T Galloway; Cynthia Gooch; John R West; Angela M Sklenka; David L Butler
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr

5.  Stimulation of gene expression and loss of anular architecture caused by experimental disc degeneration--an in vivo animal study.

Authors:  Thorsten Guehring; Georg W Omlor; Helga Lorenz; Helge Bertram; Eric Steck; Wiltrud Richter; Claus Carstens; Markus Kroeber
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Effects of age on the repair ability of mesenchymal stem cells in rabbit tendon.

Authors:  M R Dressler; D L Butler; G P Boivin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Effects of mechanical stimulation on the biomechanics and histology of stem cell-collagen sponge constructs for rabbit patellar tendon repair.

Authors:  Natalia Juncosa-Melvin; Jason T Shearn; Gregory P Boivin; Cynthia Gooch; Marc T Galloway; John R West; Victor S Nirmalanandhan; Gino Bradica; David L Butler
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2006-08

8.  Altered levels of extracellular matrix molecule mRNA in healing rabbit ligaments.

Authors:  R Boykiw; P Sciore; C Reno; L Marchuk; C B Frank; D A Hart
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.583

9.  Use of mesenchymal stem cells in a collagen matrix for Achilles tendon repair.

Authors:  R G Young; D L Butler; W Weber; A I Caplan; S L Gordon; D J Fink
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  A chemically defined medium supports in vitro proliferation and maintains the osteochondral potential of rat marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  D P Lennon; S E Haynesworth; R G Young; J E Dennis; A I Caplan
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.905

View more
  19 in total

1.  Effect of implanting a soft tissue autograft in a central-third patellar tendon defect: biomechanical and histological comparisons.

Authors:  Kirsten R C Kinneberg; Marc T Galloway; David L Butler; Jason T Shearn
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  Mechanical Actuation Systems for the Phenotype Commitment of Stem Cell-Based Tendon and Ligament Tissue Substitutes.

Authors:  Marco Govoni; Claudio Muscari; Joseph Lovecchio; Carlo Guarnieri; Emanuele Giordano
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  Mesenchymal stem cell responses to mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  Robin M Delaine-Smith; Gwendolen C Reilly
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2012-10-16

Review 4.  Tendon tissue engineering: progress, challenges, and translation to the clinic.

Authors:  J T Shearn; K R Kinneberg; N A Dyment; M T Galloway; K Kenter; C Wylie; D L Butler
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.041

5.  Three-dimensional engineered bone-ligament-bone constructs for anterior cruciate ligament replacement.

Authors:  Jinjin Ma; Michael J Smietana; Tatiana Y Kostrominova; Edward M Wojtys; Lisa M Larkin; Ellen M Arruda
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  In Silico Investigation of Angiogenesis with Growth and Stress Generation Coupled to Local Extracellular Matrix Density.

Authors:  Lowell T Edgar; James B Hoying; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 7.  Strategies for directing the structure and function of three-dimensional collagen biomaterials across length scales.

Authors:  B D Walters; J P Stegemann
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 8.  Laser-based direct-write techniques for cell printing.

Authors:  Nathan R Schiele; David T Corr; Yong Huang; Nurazhani Abdul Raof; Yubing Xie; Douglas B Chrisey
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 9.  Pathogenesis of tendinopathies: inflammation or degeneration?

Authors:  Michele Abate; Karin Gravare Silbernagel; Carl Siljeholm; Angelo Di Iorio; Daniele De Amicis; Vincenzo Salini; Suzanne Werner; Roberto Paganelli
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 10.  Evolving strategies in mechanobiology to more effectively treat damaged musculoskeletal tissues.

Authors:  David L Butler; Nathaniel A Dyment; Jason T Shearn; Kirsten R C Kinneberg; Andrew P Breidenbach; Andrea L Lalley; Steven D Gilday; Cynthia Gooch; M B Rao; Chia-feng Liu; Christopher Wylie
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.