Literature DB >> 19191163

Measurements of airborne methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) concentration in the U.S. workplace.

Karroll Booth1, Barbara Cummings, William J Karoly, Sharon Mullins, William P Robert, Mark Spence, Fran W Lichtenberg, J Banta.   

Abstract

This article summarizes a large body of industry air sampling data (8134 samples) in which airborne MDI concentrations were measured in a wide variety of manufacturing processes that use either polymeric MDI (PMDI) or monomeric (pure) MDI. Data were collected during the period 1984 through 1999. A total of 606 surveys were conducted for 251 companies at 317 facilities. The database includes 3583 personal (breathing zone) samples and 4551 area samples. Data demonstrate that workplace airborne MDI concentrations are extremely low in a majority of the manufacturing operations. Most (74.6%) of the airborne MDI concentrations measured in the personal samples were nondetectable, i.e., below the limits of quantification (LOQs). A variety of validated industrial hygiene sampling/analytical methods were used for data collection; most are modifications of OSHA Method 47. The LOQs for these methods ranged from 0.1-0.5 microg/sample. The very low vapor pressures of both monomeric MDI and PMDI largely explain the low airborne concentrations found in most operations. However, processes or applications in which the chemical is sprayed or heated may result in higher airborne concentrations and higher exposure potentials if appropriate control measures are not implemented. Data presented in this article will be a useful reference for employers in helping them to manage their health and safety program as it relates to respiratory protection during MDI/PMDI applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19191163     DOI: 10.1080/15459620902724060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  5 in total

1.  Isocyanates and work-related asthma: Findings from California, Massachusetts, Michigan, and New Jersey, 1993-2008.

Authors:  Daniel Lefkowitz; Elise Pechter; Kathleen Fitzsimmons; Margaret Lumia; Alicia C Stephens; Letitia Davis; Jennifer Flattery; Justine Weinberg; Robert J Harrison; Mary Jo Reilly; Margaret S Filios; Gretchen E White; Kenneth D Rosenman
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Glutathione reaction products with a chemical allergen, methylene-diphenyl diisocyanate, stimulate alternative macrophage activation and eosinophilic airway inflammation.

Authors:  Adam V Wisnewski; Jian Liu; Christopher M Colangelo
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Dilysine-Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate (MDI), a Urine Biomarker of MDI Exposure?

Authors:  Adam V Wisnewski; Ala F Nassar; Jian Liu; Dhimiter Bello
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Novel Loci Associated With Diisocyanate-Induced Occupational Asthma.

Authors:  Berran Yucesoy; Kenneth M Kaufman; Zana L Lummus; Matthew T Weirauch; Ge Zhang; André Cartier; Louis-Philippe Boulet; Joaquin Sastre; Santiago Quirce; Susan M Tarlo; Maria-Jesus Cruz; Xavier Munoz; John B Harley; David I Bernstein
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  N-Acetyltransferase 2 Genotypes Are Associated With Diisocyanate-Induced Asthma.

Authors:  Berran Yucesoy; Grace E Kissling; Victor J Johnson; Zana L Lummus; Denyse Gautrin; André Cartier; Louis-Philippe Boulet; Joaquin Sastre; Santiago Quirce; Susan M Tarlo; Maria-Jesus Cruz; Xavier Munoz; Michael I Luster; David I Bernstein
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.162

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.