Literature DB >> 19190456

Endoscopic endonasal approach for clival chordomas.

Martina Stippler1, Paul A Gardner, Carl H Snyderman, Ricardo L Carrau, Daniel M Prevedello, Amin B Kassam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cranial base chordomas are difficult lesions to treat. The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) takes advantage of the natural sinus corridor and may provide a less invasive approach for these midline tumors.
METHODS: Patients undergoing EEA for chordomas were selected from a database of more than 800 consecutive patients undergoing EEA at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and were retrospectively evaluated. Additionally, a systematic review of the literature of endoscopic endonasally resected chordomas was performed and compared with our personal experience.
RESULTS: Twenty patients (8 females and 12 males) underwent 26 endoscopic EEAs for cranial base chordomas. Eight chordomas (40%) were recurrent. Treatment of the 12 newly diagnosed chordomas included 8 total resections (66.7%), 2 near total resections (16.7%), and 2 subtotal resections (16.7%). Treatment of the 8 recurrent chordomas included 1 gross total resection (12.5%), 2 near total resections (25.0%), and 5 subtotal resections (62.5%). Two patients (10%) had recurrences, and 5 patients (25%) progressed during the mean follow-up period of 13 months (range, 1-45 months). Five patients (25%) underwent re-resection, 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and 1 patient died secondary to progression of disease. There was 1 intraoperative vascular complication with no sequelae. The cerebrospinal fluid leak rate was 25%, and there were no cases of bacterial meningitis. The incidence of a new permanent neurological complication was 5%. A systematic review of the literature yielded a total of 26 cases of chordomas resected via a completely endoscopic endonasal technique.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic endonasal resection of cranial base chordomas is safe once adequate experience is gained with the technique. This approach provides the potential for, at the least, similar resections compared with traditional cranial base approaches while potentially limiting morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19190456     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000338071.01241.E2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  48 in total

1.  Endoscopic transnasal intraorbital surgery: our experience with 16 cases.

Authors:  Paolo Castelnuovo; Iacopo Dallan; Davide Locatelli; Paolo Battaglia; Paolo Farneti; Peter Valentin Tomazic; Veronica Seccia; Apostolos Karligkiotis; Apostolous Karligktios; Ernesto Pasquini; Heinz Stammberger
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Endoscopic transcranial and intracranial resection: case series and design of a perioperative management protocol.

Authors:  Evan R Ransom; John Lee; John Y K Lee; James N Palmer; Alexander G Chiu
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2011-01

Review 3.  Comprehensive review on rhino-neurosurgery.

Authors:  Werner Hosemann; Henry W S Schroeder
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

4.  Classification and surgical approaches for transnasal endoscopic skull base chordoma resection: a 6-year experience with 161 cases.

Authors:  Songbai Gui; Xuyi Zong; Xinsheng Wang; Chuzhong Li; Peng Zhao; Lei Cao; Yazhuo Zhang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 5.  Current therapeutic options and novel molecular markers in skull base chordomas.

Authors:  Filippo Gagliardi; Nicola Boari; Paola Riva; Pietro Mortini
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Uncovering malpractice in appendectomies: a review of 234 cases.

Authors:  Amad J Choudhry; Seema P Anandalwar; Asad J Choudhry; Peter F Svider; Joseph O Oliver; Jean Anderson Eloy; Ravi J Chokshi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  "Round-the-Clock" Surgical Access to the Orbit.

Authors:  Alessandro Paluzzi; Paul A Gardner; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Matthew J Tormenti; S Tonya Stefko; Carl H Snyderman; Joseph C Maroon
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2014-09-02

8.  Comparing operative exposures of the le fort I osteotomy and the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach to the clivus.

Authors:  Christopher I Sanders Taylor; Almaz Kurbanov; Lee A Zimmer; Jeffrey T Keller; Philip V Theodosopoulos
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2014-09-02

9.  Analysis of the venous channel within the clivus using multidetector computed tomography digital subtraction venography.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Mizutani; Masahiro Toda; Jun Kurasawa; Takenori Akiyama; Hirokazu Fujiwara; Masahiro Jinzaki; Kazunari Yoshida
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Critical appraisal of extent of resection of clival lesions using the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach.

Authors:  Aaron R Cutler; Jagmeet S Mundi; Noriko Solomon; Jeffrey D Suh; Marilene B Wang; Marvin Bergsneider
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2013-04-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.