Literature DB >> 19190141

Antacid drug use and risk of esophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas in Los Angeles County.

Lei Duan1, Anna H Wu, Jane Sullivan-Halley, Leslie Bernstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Concern has been expressed that antacid drugs increase the risk of esophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas.
METHODS: This population-based case-control study recruited patients with incident esophageal adenocarcinoma (n = 220), gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma (n = 277), or distal gastric adenocarcinoma (n = 441) diagnosed between 1992 and 1997, and 1,356 control participants in Los Angeles County. Unconditional polychotomous multivariable logistic regression analyses were done to evaluate the association between antacid drug use and these cancers.
RESULTS: Among participants who took nonprescription acid neutralizing agents for >3 years, the odds ratio for esophageal adenocarcinoma was 6.32 compared with never users (95% confidence interval, 3.14-12.69; P(trend) < 0.01). Analyses stratified by history of physician diagnosed upper gastrointestinal (UGI) disorders revealed a greater increase in esophageal adenocarcinoma risk associated with nonprescription antacid use among persons with no UGI disorder than among those with an UGI disorder (homogeneity of trends P = 0.07). Regular use of nonprescription acid neutralizing agents was not associated with risk of adenocarcinomas of the gastric cardia or distal stomach. Regular use of prescription acid suppressive drugs was not associated with risk for any of these cancers.
CONCLUSION: We found risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma was greater among long-term nonprescription acid neutralizing drugs in participants without physician-diagnosed UGI conditions than among those with these conditions; this may represent self medication for undiagnosed precursor conditions or it may be that nonprescription acid neutralizing drugs, taken without limitation on amount used when symptoms are most intense, may permit alkaline bile reflux into the lower esophagus, thereby increasing esophageal adenocarcinoma risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19190141     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  5 in total

1.  Diabetes and risk of esophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Xuejuan Jiang; Leslie Bernstein; Chiu-Chen Tseng; Anna H Wu
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Acid suppressive drugs and gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Jeong Soo Ahn; Chun-Sick Eom; Christie Y Jeon; Sang Min Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptom severity, proton pump inhibitor use, and esophageal carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Katie S Nason; Promporn Paula Wichienkuer; Omar Awais; Matthew J Schuchert; James D Luketich; Robert W O'Rourke; John G Hunter; Cynthia D Morris; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-07

4.  Reliability of Family Proxy Data for Studies of Malignant Mesothelioma: Results from the ATSDR Pilot Surveillance.

Authors:  Natalia Melnikova; Jennifer Wu; Wendy Kaye; Maureen Orr
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2013-03-28

5.  A prospective study of vitamin and mineral supplement use and the risk of upper gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Sonja P Dawsey; Albert Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin; Christian C Abnet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.