PURPOSE: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is recognized as a key mediator of proliferation and progression in many human tumors. A series of EGFR-specific inhibitors have recently gained Food and Drug Administration approval in oncology. These strategies of EGFR inhibition have shown major tumor regressions in approximately 10% to 20% of advanced cancer patients. Many tumors, however, eventually manifest resistance to treatment. Efforts to better understand the underlying mechanisms of acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors, and potential strategies to overcome resistance, are greatly needed. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To develop cell lines with acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors we utilized the human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tumor cell line SCC-1. Cells were treated with increasing concentrations of cetuximab, gefitinib, or erlotinib, and characterized for the molecular changes in the EGFR inhibitor-resistant lines relative to the EGFR inhibitor-sensitive lines. RESULTS: EGFR inhibitor-resistant lines were able to maintain their resistant phenotype in both drug-free medium and in athymic nude mouse xenografts. In addition, EGFR inhibitor-resistant lines showed a markedly increased proliferation rate. EGFR inhibitor-resistant lines had elevated levels of phosphorylated EGFR, mitogen-activated protein kinase, AKT, and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, which were associated with reduced apoptotic capacity. Subsequent in vivo experiments indicated enhanced angiogenic potential in EGFR inhibitor-resistant lines. Finally, EGFR inhibitor-resistant lines showed cross-resistance to ionizing radiation. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed EGFR inhibitor-resistant human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. This model provides a valuable preclinical tool to investigate molecular mechanisms of acquired resistance to EGFR blockade.
PURPOSE: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is recognized as a key mediator of proliferation and progression in many humantumors. A series of EGFR-specific inhibitors have recently gained Food and Drug Administration approval in oncology. These strategies of EGFR inhibition have shown major tumor regressions in approximately 10% to 20% of advanced cancerpatients. Many tumors, however, eventually manifest resistance to treatment. Efforts to better understand the underlying mechanisms of acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors, and potential strategies to overcome resistance, are greatly needed. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To develop cell lines with acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors we utilized the human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tumor cell line SCC-1. Cells were treated with increasing concentrations of cetuximab, gefitinib, or erlotinib, and characterized for the molecular changes in the EGFR inhibitor-resistant lines relative to the EGFR inhibitor-sensitive lines. RESULTS:EGFR inhibitor-resistant lines were able to maintain their resistant phenotype in both drug-free medium and in athymic nude mouse xenografts. In addition, EGFR inhibitor-resistant lines showed a markedly increased proliferation rate. EGFR inhibitor-resistant lines had elevated levels of phosphorylated EGFR, mitogen-activated protein kinase, AKT, and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, which were associated with reduced apoptotic capacity. Subsequent in vivo experiments indicated enhanced angiogenic potential in EGFR inhibitor-resistant lines. Finally, EGFR inhibitor-resistant lines showed cross-resistance to ionizing radiation. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed EGFR inhibitor-resistant human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. This model provides a valuable preclinical tool to investigate molecular mechanisms of acquired resistance to EGFR blockade.
Authors: Susumu Kobayashi; Titus J Boggon; Tajhal Dayaram; Pasi A Jänne; Olivier Kocher; Matthew Meyerson; Bruce E Johnson; Michael J Eck; Daniel G Tenen; Balázs Halmos Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-02-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: E Ramsay Camp; Justin Summy; Todd W Bauer; Wenbiao Liu; Gary E Gallick; Lee M Ellis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-01-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: J Rubin Grandis; M F Melhem; W E Gooding; R Day; V A Holst; M M Wagener; S D Drenning; D J Tweardy Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1998-06-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Baldassarre Stea; Ryan Falsey; Kerri Kislin; Jay Patel; Heather Glanzberg; Steven Carey; Aaron A Ambrad; Emmanuelle J Meuillet; Jesse D Martinez Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2003-12-08 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Fortunato Ciardiello; Roberto Bianco; Roberta Caputo; Rosa Caputo; Vincenzo Damiano; Teresa Troiani; Davide Melisi; Ferdinando De Vita; Sabino De Placido; A Raffaele Bianco; Giampaolo Tortora Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Shyhmin Huang; Sergio Benavente; Eric A Armstrong; Chunrong Li; Deric L Wheeler; Paul M Harari Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Mari Iida; Toni M Brand; Megan M Starr; Chunrong Li; Evan J Huppert; Neha Luthar; Mikkel W Pedersen; Ivan D Horak; Michael Kragh; Deric L Wheeler Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: F Couñago; A Rodríguez; P Calvo; J Luna; J L Monroy; B Taboada; V Díaz; N Rodríguez de Dios Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Toni M Brand; Emily F Dunn; Mari Iida; Rebecca A Myers; Kellie T Kostopoulos; Chunrong Li; Chimera R Peet; Deric L Wheeler Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Nelson Ung; Tracy L Putoczki; Stanley S Stylli; Irvin Ng; John M Mariadason; Timothy A Chan; Hong-Jian Zhu; Rodney B Luwor Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Zachary S Morris; Emily I Guy; David M Francis; Monica M Gressett; Lauryn R Werner; Lakeesha L Carmichael; Richard K Yang; Eric A Armstrong; Shyhmin Huang; Fariba Navid; Stephen D Gillies; Alan Korman; Jacquelyn A Hank; Alexander L Rakhmilevich; Paul M Harari; Paul M Sondel Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 12.701