STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of sleep on fear conditioning, extinction, extinction recall, and generalization of extinction recall in healthy humans. DESIGN: During the Conditioning phase, a mild, 0.5-sec shock followed conditioned stimuli (CS+s), which consisted of 2 differently colored lamps. A third lamp color was interspersed but never reinforced (CS-). Immediately after Conditioning, one CS+ was extinguished (CS+E) by presentation without shocks (Extinction phase). The other CS+ went unextinguished (CS+U). Twelve hours later, following continuous normal daytime waking (Wake group, N=27) or an equal interval containing a normal night's sleep (Sleep group, N=26), conditioned responses (CRs) to all CSs were measured (Extinction Recall phase). It was hypothesized that the Sleep versus Wake group would show greater extinction recall and/or generalization of extinction recall from the CS+E to the CS+U. SETTING: Academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Paid normal volunteers. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Square-root transformed skin conductance response (SCR) measured conditioned responding. During Extinction Recall, the Group (Wake or Sleep) x CS+ Type (CS+E or CS+U) interaction was significant (P = 0.04). SCRs to the CS+E did not differ between groups, whereas SCRs to the CS+U were significantly smaller in the Sleep group. Additionally, SCRs were significantly larger to the CS+U than CS+E in the Wake but not the Sleep group. CONCLUSIONS: After sleep, extinction memory generalized from an extinguished conditioned stimulus to a similarly conditioned but unextinguished stimulus. Clinically, adequate sleep may promote generalization of extinction memory from specific stimuli treated during exposure therapy to similar stimuli later encountered in vivo.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of sleep on fear conditioning, extinction, extinction recall, and generalization of extinction recall in healthy humans. DESIGN: During the Conditioning phase, a mild, 0.5-sec shock followed conditioned stimuli (CS+s), which consisted of 2 differently colored lamps. A third lamp color was interspersed but never reinforced (CS-). Immediately after Conditioning, one CS+ was extinguished (CS+E) by presentation without shocks (Extinction phase). The other CS+ went unextinguished (CS+U). Twelve hours later, following continuous normal daytime waking (Wake group, N=27) or an equal interval containing a normal night's sleep (Sleep group, N=26), conditioned responses (CRs) to all CSs were measured (Extinction Recall phase). It was hypothesized that the Sleep versus Wake group would show greater extinction recall and/or generalization of extinction recall from the CS+E to the CS+U. SETTING: Academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Paid normal volunteers. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Square-root transformed skin conductance response (SCR) measured conditioned responding. During Extinction Recall, the Group (Wake or Sleep) x CS+ Type (CS+E or CS+U) interaction was significant (P = 0.04). SCRs to the CS+E did not differ between groups, whereas SCRs to the CS+U were significantly smaller in the Sleep group. Additionally, SCRs were significantly larger to the CS+U than CS+E in the Wake but not the Sleep group. CONCLUSIONS: After sleep, extinction memory generalized from an extinguished conditioned stimulus to a similarly conditioned but unextinguished stimulus. Clinically, adequate sleep may promote generalization of extinction memory from specific stimuli treated during exposure therapy to similar stimuli later encountered in vivo.
Authors: Jeffrey M Ellenbogen; Peter T Hu; Jessica D Payne; Debra Titone; Matthew P Walker Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-04-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Peter T Morgan; Edward F Pace-Schott; Zakir H Sahul; Vladimir Coric; Robert Stickgold; Robert T Malison Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2005-11-02 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Edward F Pace-Schott; Rebecca M C Spencer; Shilpa Vijayakumar; Nafis A K Ahmed; Patrick W Verga; Scott P Orr; Roger K Pitman; Mohammed R Milad Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Edward F Pace-Schott; Zoe S Rubin; Lauren E Tracy; Rebecca M C Spencer; Scott P Orr; Patrick W Verga Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2015-06-27 Impact factor: 3.222