OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether caregiver and family characteristics predict success in a family-based lifestyle intervention program for children and adolescents. METHOD: Participants were 111 overweight and obese children (7-15 years) who attended a family-based weight-reduction program. Body mass index (BMI) and BMI standard deviation scores (BMI-SDS) of index child, and BMI of family members, family adversity characteristics, depression, and attachment attitudes of the primary caregiver were assessed. RESULTS: Risk of nonresponse (<or=5% reduction of BMI-SDS or dropout) was elevated in older children, cases with obese sibling(s), maternal depression, and avoidant attachment attitude. In a logistic regression analysis, maternal depression, attachment attitude, and age of index child explained common variance whereas the presence of obese siblings explained unique variance in nonresponding. DISCUSSION: To meet the specific needs of all participating families and to prevent the discouraging experience of failure in weight-control interventions, our data suggest that special support should be provided to adolescents with obese siblings, and cases of maternal depression, and avoidant attachment attitude. (c) 2009 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether caregiver and family characteristics predict success in a family-based lifestyle intervention program for children and adolescents. METHOD:Participants were 111 overweight and obesechildren (7-15 years) who attended a family-based weight-reduction program. Body mass index (BMI) and BMI standard deviation scores (BMI-SDS) of index child, and BMI of family members, family adversity characteristics, depression, and attachment attitudes of the primary caregiver were assessed. RESULTS: Risk of nonresponse (<or=5% reduction of BMI-SDS or dropout) was elevated in older children, cases with obese sibling(s), maternal depression, and avoidant attachment attitude. In a logistic regression analysis, maternal depression, attachment attitude, and age of index child explained common variance whereas the presence of obese siblings explained unique variance in nonresponding. DISCUSSION: To meet the specific needs of all participating families and to prevent the discouraging experience of failure in weight-control interventions, our data suggest that special support should be provided to adolescents with obese siblings, and cases of maternal depression, and avoidant attachment attitude. (c) 2009 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: Keeley J Pratt; Angela L Lamson; Melvin S Swanson; Suzanne Lazorick; David N Collier Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-10-19 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Thao-Ly T Phan; Fang Fang Chen; Alison Taggi Pinto; Courtney Cox; Jennifer Robbins; Anne E Kazak Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Ian S Zenlea; E Thomaseo Burton; Nissa Askins; Emily Israel Pluhar; Erinn T Rhodes Journal: Clin Pediatr (Phila) Date: 2015-03-15 Impact factor: 1.168
Authors: Abby L Braden; Jennifer Madowitz; Brittany E Matheson; Kristie Bergmann; Scott J Crow; Kerri N Boutelle Journal: Child Obes Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 2.992
Authors: Lori A J Scott-Sheldon; Larry V Hedges; Chris Cyr; Deborah Young-Hyman; Laura Kettel Khan; Mackenzie Magnus; Heather King; Sonia Arteaga; John Cawley; Christina D Economos; Debra Haire-Joshu; Christine M Hunter; Bruce Y Lee; Shiriki K Kumanyika; Lorrene D Ritchie; Thomas N Robinson; Marlene B Schwartz Journal: Child Obes Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 2.992
Authors: Steven T Johnson; Amanda S Newton; Meera Chopra; Jeanette Buckingham; Terry T K Huang; Paul W Franks; Mary M Jetha; Geoff D C Ball Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 2.125