Susan Harch1, Helen Whitford2, Catriona McLean3. 1. Department of Anatomical Pathology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: susanharch@gmail.com. 2. Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 3. Department of Anatomical Pathology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the development of targeted therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), some patients fail to respond to medical therapy. There are a number of types of PAH, one of which is pulmonary venoocclusive disease (PVOD). Unlike other PAH types, the hallmark pathology of PVOD is fibrous occlusion of the small venules, potentially with arterial involvement. It was hypothesized that a lack of response to medical therapy in clinically diagnosed PAH can be explained by misdiagnosed PVOD. METHODS: This study reviewed cases of 14 patients with clinically diagnosed PAH who had failed to respond to medical therapy and had lung tissue available from autopsy or explant. Control samples (n = 6) were obtained from lungs explanted for other causes, and a previous transthoracic echocardiogram excluded pulmonary hypertension. Comprehensive vessel morphometry was performed, and the clinical data reviewed. RESULTS: Vessel analysis confirmed 86% of case patients had PVOD and 14% had arterial-only PAH (artPAH). In the PVOD case patients, significant pathology was present in all vessel types with similar obstructive, intimal fibrosis in the venules (p < 0.0001) and arterioles (p < 0.0001). This was considerably different from the intimal concentric laminar smooth muscle proliferation in the artPAH cases. There were no significant differences in clinical presentation between PVOD and artPAH case patients. Pulmonary edema was not observed in the PVOD cases. CONCLUSIONS: PVOD is an underdiagnosed and commonly misdiagnosed cause of pulmonary hypertension, which may present with a failure to respond to medical therapy. Further studies on PVOD may help confirm whether a change in its classification as a type of PAH is necessary.
BACKGROUND: Despite the development of targeted therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), some patients fail to respond to medical therapy. There are a number of types of PAH, one of which is pulmonary venoocclusive disease (PVOD). Unlike other PAH types, the hallmark pathology of PVOD is fibrous occlusion of the small venules, potentially with arterial involvement. It was hypothesized that a lack of response to medical therapy in clinically diagnosed PAH can be explained by misdiagnosed PVOD. METHODS: This study reviewed cases of 14 patients with clinically diagnosed PAH who had failed to respond to medical therapy and had lung tissue available from autopsy or explant. Control samples (n = 6) were obtained from lungs explanted for other causes, and a previous transthoracic echocardiogram excluded pulmonary hypertension. Comprehensive vessel morphometry was performed, and the clinical data reviewed. RESULTS: Vessel analysis confirmed 86% of case patients had PVOD and 14% had arterial-only PAH (artPAH). In the PVOD case patients, significant pathology was present in all vessel types with similar obstructive, intimal fibrosis in the venules (p < 0.0001) and arterioles (p < 0.0001). This was considerably different from the intimal concentric laminar smooth muscle proliferation in the artPAH cases. There were no significant differences in clinical presentation between PVOD and artPAH case patients. Pulmonary edema was not observed in the PVOD cases. CONCLUSIONS: PVOD is an underdiagnosed and commonly misdiagnosed cause of pulmonary hypertension, which may present with a failure to respond to medical therapy. Further studies on PVOD may help confirm whether a change in its classification as a type of PAH is necessary.
Authors: Nicole B Gabler; Benjamin French; Brian L Strom; Ziyue Liu; Harold I Palevsky; Darren B Taichman; Steven M Kawut; Scott D Halpern Journal: Chest Date: 2011-09-22 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Jeremy P Wrobel; Catriona A McLean; Bruce R Thompson; Christopher R Stuart-Andrews; Eldho Paul; Gregory I Snell; Trevor J Williams Journal: Pulm Circ Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 3.017
Authors: Jason M Elinoff; Richa Agarwal; Christopher F Barnett; Raymond L Benza; Michael J Cuttica; Ahmed M Gharib; Michael P Gray; Paul M Hassoun; Anna R Hemnes; Marc Humbert; Todd M Kolb; Tim Lahm; Jane A Leopold; Stephen C Mathai; Vallerie V McLaughlin; Ioana R Preston; Erika B Rosenzweig; Oksana A Shlobin; Virginia D Steen; Roham T Zamanian; Michael A Solomon Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2018-07-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Nauman A Khan; Rizwan A Khan; Adriano R Tonelli; Kristin B Highland; Neal F Chaisson; Miriam Jacob; Rahul Renapurkar; Raed A Dweik; Gustavo A Heresi Journal: Chest Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Jan K Hennigs; Gunhild Keller; Hans Jörg Baumann; Friedemann Honecker; Stefan Kluge; Carsten Bokemeyer; Tim H Brümmendorf; Hans Klose Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2011-05-23 Impact factor: 3.317
Authors: Nima Golzy; Stuti Fernandes; Justin Sharim; Rikin Tank; Henry D Tazelaar; Howard E Epstein; Victor Tapson; Antoine Hage Journal: Respir Med Case Rep Date: 2016-09-27
Authors: Monika Szturmowicz; Aneta Kacprzak; Barbara Burakowska; Marcin Kurzyna; Anna Fijałkowska; Iwona Bestry; Adam Torbicki Journal: Multidiscip Respir Med Date: 2010-12-20