Literature DB >> 19188420

The development and testing of a survey instrument for benchmarking dental plan performance: using insured patients' experiences as a gauge of dental care quality.

San Keller1, Gary C Col Martin, Christian T Evensen, Robert H Capt Mitton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no standard, nonproprietary method for providing national benchmarks of dental care quality as described by patients. The purpose of this research was to develop such a tool following guidelines of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) initiative.
METHODS: The authors identified domains of dental care quality via qualitative methods, including a literature review, stakeholder interviews and focus groups with beneficiaries, and they cognitively tested draft questions with patients to yield a pilot survey. Psychometric analyses of pilot data (n = 3,264) identified summary indexes and guided survey revisions. The authors used two waves of subsequent data collection (n = 4,221) to test the validity of the revised survey.
RESULTS: The mean response rate across three rounds of data collection was 51 percent. Statistical analysis indicated that 17 questions could be reliably collapsed into three composite measures: "Care From Dentist and Staff" (reliability = 0.89, scaling success = 100 percent); "Access to Dental Care" (reliability = 0.78, scaling success = 100 percent); and "Dental Plan Coverage/Service" (reliability = 0.84, scaling success = 100 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: The validity of the survey was supported in mail and Internet modes for the American English language, and the instrument was approved by the CAHPS consortium for distribution as the CAHPS Dental Plan Survey. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS. A tool is available now for assessing dental care quality by measuring adult patients' experiences with their dental care and coverage. The authors tested this instrument only in a population with third-party coverage, however, which is a potential limitation that should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19188420     DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  5 in total

1.  A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures.

Authors:  Claudia Bull; Joshua Byrnes; Ruvini Hettiarachchi; Martin Downes
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  A systematic review of quality measures used in primary care dentistry.

Authors:  Matthew J Byrne; Martin Tickle; Anne-Marie Glenny; Stephen Campbell; Tom Goodwin; Lucy O'Malley
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 2.607

3.  Quality of care in sickle cell disease: Cross-sectional study and development of a measure for adults reporting on ambulatory and emergency department care.

Authors:  Christian T Evensen; Marsha J Treadwell; San Keller; Roger Levine; Kathryn L Hassell; Ellen M Werner; Wally R Smith
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Everybody Brush! Consumer Satisfaction with a Tooth Decay Prevention Program.

Authors:  Joana Cunha-Cruz; Colleen E Huebner; Sharity Ludwig; Jeanne Dysert; Melissa Mitchell; Gary Allen; R Mike Shirtcliff; JoAnna M Scott; Peter Milgrom
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-09-27

5.  Perceptions of US Adolescents and Adults With Sickle Cell Disease on Their Quality of Care.

Authors:  Julie Kanter; Robert Gibson; Raymona H Lawrence; Matthew P Smeltzer; Norma L Pugh; Jeffrey Glassberg; Rita V Masese; Allison A King; Cecelia Calhoun; Jane S Hankins; Marsha Treadwell
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-05-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.