Literature DB >> 19187418

Responsiveness and clinical utility of the geriatric self-efficacy index for urinary incontinence.

Cara Tannenbaum1, Judith Brouillette, Julie Michaud, Nicol Korner-Bitensky, Chantale Dumoulin, Jacques Corcos, Le Mai Tu, Marie-Claude Lemieux, Stephane Ouellet, Luc Valiquette.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report on the responsiveness testing and clinical utility of the 12-item Geriatric Self-Efficacy Index for Urinary Incontinence (GSE-UI).
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Six urinary incontinence (UI) outpatient clinics in Quebec, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling incontinent adults aged 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS: The abridged 12-item GSE-UI, measuring older adults' level of confidence for preventing urine loss, was administered to all new consecutive incontinent patients 1 week before their initial clinic visit, at baseline, and 3 months posttreatment. At follow-up, a positive rating of improvement in UI was ascertained from patients and their physicians using the Patient's and Clinician's Global Impression of Improvement scales, respectively. Responsiveness of the GSE-UI was calculated using Guyatt's change index. Its clinical utility was determined using receiver operating curves.
RESULTS: Eighty-nine of 228 eligible patients (39.0%) participated (mean age 72.6+5.8, range 65-90). At 3-month follow-up, 22.5% of patients were very much better, and 41.6% were a little or much better. Guyatt's change index was 2.6 for patients who changed by a clinically meaningful amount and 1.5 for patients having experienced any level of improvement. An improvement of 14 points on the 12-item GSE-UI had a sensitivity of 75.1% and a specificity of 78.2% for detecting clinically meaningful changes in UI status. Mean GSE-UI scores varied according to improvement status (P<.001) and correlated with changes in quality-of-life scores (r=0.7, P<.001) and reductions in UI episodes (r=0.4, P=.004).
CONCLUSION: The GSE-UI is responsive and clinically useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19187418     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02146.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  5 in total

1.  The waiting room "wait": from annoyance to opportunity.

Authors:  Heather N Sherwin; Megan McKeown; Michael F Evans; Onil K Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  A randomized-controlled trial pilot study examining the effect of extracorporeal magnetic innervation in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Magdalena Weber-Rajek; Agnieszka Radzimińska; Agnieszka Strączyńska; Marta Podhorecka; Mariusz Kozakiewicz; Radosław Perkowski; Piotr Jarzemski; Kornelia Kędziora-Kornatowska; Aleksander Goch
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.458

3.  Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Chantale Dumoulin; Licia P Cacciari; E Jean C Hay-Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-04

4.  Assessment of the Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT) and Extracorporeal Magnetic Innervation (ExMI) in Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Magdalena Weber-Rajek; Agnieszka Strączyńska; Katarzyna Strojek; Zuzanna Piekorz; Beata Pilarska; Marta Podhorecka; Kinga Sobieralska-Michalak; Aleksander Goch; Agnieszka Radzimińska
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Group-Based vs Individual Pelvic Floor Muscle Training to Treat Urinary Incontinence in Older Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Chantale Dumoulin; Mélanie Morin; Coraline Danieli; Licia Cacciari; Marie-Hélène Mayrand; Michel Tousignant; Michal Abrahamowicz
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.