Literature DB >> 19186893

The popularity contest at work: who wins, why, and what do they receive?

Brent A Scott1, Timothy A Judge.   

Abstract

In 2 studies, the authors investigated the popularity of employees at work. They tested a model that positioned personality in the form of core self-evaluations and situational position in the form of communication network centrality as antecedents of popularity and interpersonal citizenship and counterproductive work behaviors received from coworkers as outcomes of popularity. Data from 116 employees and 383 coworkers in Study 1 and 139 employees, their significant others, and 808 coworkers in Study 2 generally supported the model. Core self-evaluations and communication network centrality were positively related to popularity, and popular employees reported receiving more citizenship behaviors and fewer counterproductive work behaviors from their coworkers than less popular employees, even controlling for interpersonal liking. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19186893     DOI: 10.1037/a0012951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  5 in total

1.  Social network sensors for early detection of contagious outbreaks.

Authors:  Nicholas A Christakis; James H Fowler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Becoming popular: interpersonal emotion regulation predicts relationship formation in real life social networks.

Authors:  Karen Niven; David Garcia; Ilmo van der Löwe; David Holman; Warren Mansell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-29

3.  Moving away from exhaustion: how core self-evaluations influence academic burnout.

Authors:  Penghu Lian; Yunfeng Sun; Zhigang Ji; Hanzhong Li; Jiaxi Peng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Determinants and effects of medical students' core self-evaluation tendencies on clinical competence and workplace well-being in clerkship.

Authors:  Yung Kai Lin; Der-Yuan Chen; Blossom Yen-Ju Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Understanding well-being at work: Development and validation of the eudaimonic workplace well-being scale.

Authors:  Amy L Bartels; Suzanne J Peterson; Christopher S Reina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.