Literature DB >> 19186344

Can individuals identify if needling was performed with an acupuncture needle or a non-penetrating sham needle?

Anna Enblom1, Mats Hammar, Gunnar Steineck, Sussanne Börjeson.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A control treatment in acupuncture research must be credible, regardless if the needling is performed by one or by several therapists.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate if individuals could identify whether needling had been given with an acupuncture needle or a sham needle and if the therapist influenced this ability.
DESIGN: Eighty individuals were randomized to one single needling given by one of four physiotherapists using either an invasive needle or a non-penetrating telescopic sham needle.
RESULTS: An equal proportion of individuals, 27 (68%), in the acupuncture group and the sham group answered incorrectly or was not sure at all regarding needling type but the proportion varied between the therapists from 55 to 80% (ns). Bang's blinding index was 0.20 (95% CI 0.03-0.36) in the acupuncture group and 0.10 (95% CI 0.09-0.29) in the sham group (interpretation: 20 and 10% identified needling type beyond statistical chance). Acupuncture was on a four-grade scale rated as median "mildly painful" and sham as "not painful" (ns). Pain ratings varied from median "not" to "mildly painful" in the therapists (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Two thirds of individuals needled by acupuncture as well as sham could not identify needling type and only 10-20% of the individuals were unblinded beyond chance. The therapists, not the needling type, influenced how painful the needling was perceived. IMPLICATIONS: To achieve blinding success in acupuncture efficacy studies using the sham needle, the needling procedure must be strictly standardized in order to minimize differences between the therapists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19186344     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2008.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Complement Ther Med        ISSN: 0965-2299            Impact factor:   2.446


  14 in total

1.  Is acupuncture no more than a placebo? Extensive discussion required about possible bias.

Authors:  Shizhe Deng; Xiaofeng Zhao; Rong DU; S I He; Yan Wen; Linghui Huang; Guang Tian; Chao Zhang; Zhihong Meng; Xuemin Shi
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Assessing blinding in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture: challenges and recommendations.

Authors:  Ann K Hopton; Hugh Macpherson
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 1.978

3.  Placebo acupuncture as a form of ritual touch healing: a neurophenomenological model.

Authors:  Catherine E Kerr; Jessica R Shaw; Lisa A Conboy; John M Kelley; Eric Jacobson; Ted J Kaptchuk
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2011-03-11

Review 4.  Factors contributing to therapeutic effects evaluated in acupuncture clinical trials.

Authors:  Guang-Xia Shi; Xiao-Min Yang; Cun-Zhi Liu; Lin-Peng Wang
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  The nonpenetrating telescopic sham needle may blind patients with different characteristics and experiences when treated by several therapists.

Authors:  Anna Enblom; Anna Johnsson; Mats Hammar; Gunnar Steineck; Sussanne Börjeson
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 2.629

6.  Acupuncture for menopausal vasomotor symptoms: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Marie Pirotta; Carolyn Ee; Helena Teede; Patty Chondros; Simon French; Stephen Myers; Charlie Xue
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Blinding measured: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture.

Authors:  Alex Moroz; Brian Freed; Laura Tiedemann; Heejung Bang; Melanie Howell; Jongbae J Park
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 2.629

8.  Efficacy of myofascial trigger point dry needling in the prevention of pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Orlando Mayoral; Isabel Salvat; María Teresa Martín; Stella Martín; Jesús Santiago; José Cotarelo; Constantino Rodríguez
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 9.  Placebo Devices as Effective Control Methods in Acupuncture Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Claire Shuiqing Zhang; Hsiewe Ying Tan; George Shengxi Zhang; Anthony Lin Zhang; Charlie Changli Xue; Yi Min Xie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effect of acupuncture on Deqi traits and pain intensity in primary dysmenorrhea: analysis of data from a larger randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Guang-Xia Shi; Qian-Qian Li; Cun-Zhi Liu; Jiang Zhu; Lin-Peng Wang; Jing Wang; Li-Li Han; Li-Ping Guan; Meng-Meng Wu
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.659

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.