Literature DB >> 1918629

Effect of different types of auditory stimulation on vowel formant frequencies in multichannel cochlear implant users.

M A Svirsky1, E A Tobey.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigating the effects of auditory stimulation delivered via a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant upon vowel production in adventitiously deafened adult speakers are reported. The first experiment contrasts vowel formant frequencies produced without auditory stimulation (implant processor OFF) to those produced with auditory stimulation (processor ON). Significant shifts in second formant frequencies were observed for intermediate vowels produced without auditory stimulation; however, no significant shifts were observed for the point vowels. Higher first formant frequencies occurred in five of eight vowels when the processor was turned ON versus OFF. A second experiment contrasted productions of the word "head" produced with a FULL map, OFF condition, and a SINGLE channel condition that restricted the amount of auditory information received by the subjects. This experiment revealed significant shifts in second formant frequencies between FULL map utterances and the other conditions. No significant differences in second formant frequencies were observed between SINGLE channel and OFF conditions. These data suggest auditory feedback information may be used to adjust the articulation of some speech sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1918629     DOI: 10.1121/1.400727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  The Lombard effect observed in speech produced by cochlear implant users in noisy environments: A naturalistic study.

Authors:  Jaewook Lee; Hussnain Ali; Ali Ziaei; Emily A Tobey; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Weighting of Auditory Feedback Across the English Vowel Space.

Authors:  David Purcell; Kevin Munhall
Journal:  Proc Int Semin Speech Prod       Date:  2008-01-01

3.  Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Thomas M Talavage; Shivank Sinha; Heidi Neuburger; Mahan Azadpour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Acoustic analysis of speech of cochlear implantees and its implications.

Authors:  Anjali R Kant; Rajesh Patadia; Prajakta Govale; R Rangasayee; Milind Kirtane
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.372

5.  Speech motor learning in profoundly deaf adults.

Authors:  Sazzad M Nasir; David J Ostry
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 24.884

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.