Literature DB >> 19186288

Measurement of quality and assurance of safety in the critically ill.

Peter J Pronovost1, J Bryan Sexton, Julius Cuong Pham, Christine A Goeschel, Bradford D Winters, Marlene R Miller.   

Abstract

The global health care community has worked tirelessly for nearly a decade to make medical care safer for patients, but it still has limited ability to evaluate whether safety has improved. While there is a universal push to measure safety outcomes, the main barrier has been poor investment in the basic science of patient safety. This science would allow us to comprehend the causes of harm, design and pilot test interventions to reduce harm, and robustly evaluate their impact. This article describes several dilemmas in measuring patient safety, outlines a conceptual model and presents a framework for measuring patient safety, and offers future directions. Future research should seek to create a scientifically sound and feasible safety scorecard and improve performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19186288     DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2008.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chest Med        ISSN: 0272-5231            Impact factor:   2.878


  5 in total

1.  Relation between hospital orthopaedic specialisation and outcomes in patients aged 65 and older: retrospective analysis of US Medicare data.

Authors:  Tyson P Hagen; Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin; Peter Cram
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-02-11

2.  Quality Improvement in Critical Care: Selection and Development of Quality Indicators.

Authors:  Carla A Chrusch; Claudio M Martin; The Quality Improvement In Critical Care Project
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.409

3.  Monitoring intensive care unit performance-impact of a novel individualised performance scorecard in critical care medicine: a mixed-methods study protocol.

Authors:  Shannon M Fernando; David Neilipovitz; Aimee J Sarti; Erin Rosenberg; Rabia Ishaq; Mary Thornton; John Kim
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-21       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Acting between guidelines and reality- an interview study exploring the strategies of first line managers in patient safety work.

Authors:  Mats Hedsköld; Magna Andreen Sachs; Torleif Rosander; Mia von Knorring; Karin Pukk Härenstam
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Measurement of harms in community care: a qualitative study of use of the NHS Safety Thermometer.

Authors:  Liz Brewster; Carolyn Tarrant; Janet Willars; Natalie Armstrong
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 7.035

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.