Literature DB >> 1918623

Sound exposures and hearing thresholds of symphony orchestra musicians.

J D Royster1, L H Royster, M C Killion.   

Abstract

To assess the risk of noise-induced hearing loss among musicians in the Chicago Symphony Orchestra, personal dosimeters set to the 3-dB exchange rate were used to obtain 68 noise exposure measurements during rehearsals and concerts. The musicians' Leq values ranged from 79-99 dB A-weighted sound pressure level [dB(A)], with a mean of 89.9 dB(A). Based on 15 h of on-the-job exposure per week, the corresponding 8-h daily Leq (excluding off-the-job practice and playing) ranged from 75-95 dB(A) with a mean of 85.5 dB(A). Mean hearing threshold levels (HTLs) for 59 musicians were better than those for an unscreened nonindustral noise-exposed population (NINEP), and only slightly worse than the 0.50 fractile data for the ISO 7029 (1984) screened presbycusis population. However, 52.5% of individual musicians showed notched audiograms consistent with noise-induced hearing damage. Violinists and violists showed significantly poorer thresholds at 3-6 kHz in the left ear than in the right ear, consistent with the left ear's greater exposure from their instruments. After HTLs were corrected for age and sex, HTLs were found to be significantly better for both ears of musicians playing bass, cello, harp, or piano and for the right ears of violinists and violists than for their left ears or for both ears of other musicians. For 32 musicians for whom both HTLs and Leq were obtained, HTLs at 3-6 kHz were found to be correlated with the Leq measured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1918623     DOI: 10.1121/1.400719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  Surveillance of noise exposure in the Danish workplace: a baseline survey.

Authors:  S Kock; T Andersen; H A Kolstad; B Kofoed-Nielsen; F Wiesler; J P Bonde
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  [Hearing protectors in musicians].

Authors:  B Richter; M Zander; B Hohmann; C Spahn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Analog-to-digital conversion to accommodate the dynamics of live music in hearing instruments.

Authors:  Neil S Hockley; Frauke Bahlmann; Bernadette Fulton
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-09

Review 4.  [The professional ear user-implications for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of ear diseases].

Authors:  David Bächinger; Raphael Jecker; Jean-Christoph Hannig; Andreas Werner; Horst Hildebrandt; Michael Eidenbenz; Martin Kompis; Tobias Kleinjung; Dorothe Veraguth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 1.330

5.  Noise and the classical musician.

Authors:  D McBride; F Gill; D Proops; M Harrington; K Gardiner; C Attwell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992 Dec 19-26

6.  Noise-induced hearing loss and its prevention: Integration of data from animal models and human clinical trials.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Tanisha L Hammill; William J Murphy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in college music majors and nonmusic majors.

Authors:  Rebecca L Warner Henning; Kate Bobholz
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.867

8.  Occupational hearing loss of the workmen of an open cast chromite mines.

Authors:  Sunamani Kerketta; Rajendra Gartia; Somanath Bagh
Journal:  Indian J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2012-01

9.  Loud music listening.

Authors:  Nicolae Petrescu
Journal:  Mcgill J Med       Date:  2008-07

10.  Prevalence of high frequency hearing loss consistent with noise exposure among people working with sound systems and general population in Brazil: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Regina P El Dib; Edina M K Silva; José F Morais; Virgínia F M Trevisani
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.