Literature DB >> 19186150

UVA generates pyrimidine dimers in DNA directly.

Yong Jiang1, Mahir Rabbi, Minkyu Kim, Changhong Ke, Whasil Lee, Robert L Clark, Piotr A Mieczkowski, Piotr E Marszalek.   

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that UVA radiation, which makes up approximately 95% of the solar UV light reaching the Earth's surface and is also commonly used for cosmetic purposes, is genotoxic. However, in contrast to UVC and UVB, the mechanisms by which UVA produces various DNA lesions are still unclear. In addition, the relative amounts of various types of UVA lesions and their mutagenic significance are also a subject of debate. Here, we exploit atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging of individual DNA molecules, alone and in complexes with a suite of DNA repair enzymes and antibodies, to directly quantify UVA damage and reexamine its basic mechanisms at a single-molecule level. By combining the activity of endonuclease IV and T4 endonuclease V on highly purified and UVA-irradiated pUC18 plasmids, we show by direct AFM imaging that UVA produces a significant amount of abasic sites and cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs). However, we find that only approximately 60% of the T4 endonuclease V-sensitive sites, which are commonly counted as CPDs, are true CPDs; the other 40% are abasic sites. Most importantly, our results obtained by AFM imaging of highly purified native and synthetic DNA using T4 endonuclease V, photolyase, and anti-CPD antibodies strongly suggest that CPDs are produced by UVA directly. Thus, our observations contradict the predominant view that as-yet-unidentified photosensitizers are required to transfer the energy of UVA to DNA to produce CPDs. Our results may help to resolve the long-standing controversy about the origin of UVA-produced CPDs in DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19186150      PMCID: PMC2716568          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  55 in total

Review 1.  UV-induced DNA damage and repair: a review.

Authors:  Rajeshwar P Sinha; Donat P Häder
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  Quantifying clustered DNA damage induction and repair by gel electrophoresis, electronic imaging and number average length analysis.

Authors:  Betsy M Sutherland; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Paula V Bennett; Jacques Laval; John C Sutherland
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Intersegmental interactions in supercoiled DNA: atomic force microscope study.

Authors:  Luda S Shlyakhtenko; Lela Miloseska; Vladimir N Potaman; Richard R Sinden; Yuri L Lyubchenko
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2003 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Plasmid DNA breakage by decay of DNA-associated Auger electron emitters: approaches to analysis of experimental data.

Authors:  Pavel N Lobachevsky; Tom C Karagiannis; Roger F Martin
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Larger yield of cyclobutane dimers than 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine in the DNA of UVA-irradiated human skin cells.

Authors:  Sophie Courdavault; Caroline Baudouin; Marie Charveron; Alain Favier; Jean Cadet; Thierry Douki
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Bipyrimidine photoproducts rather than oxidative lesions are the main type of DNA damage involved in the genotoxic effect of solar UVA radiation.

Authors:  Thierry Douki; Anne Reynaud-Angelin; Jean Cadet; Evelyne Sage
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-08-05       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Polylysine-coated mica can be used to observe systematic changes in the supercoiled DNA conformation by scanning force microscopy in solution.

Authors:  Malte Bussiek; Norbert Mücke; Jörg Langowski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  The production of single strand and double strand breaks in DNA in aqueous solution by vacuum UV photons below 10 eV.

Authors:  M Folkard; K M Prise; C J Turner; B D Michael
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.972

9.  Silatrane-based surface chemistry for immobilization of DNA, protein-DNA complexes and other biological materials.

Authors:  Luda S Shlyakhtenko; Alexander A Gall; Alexander Filonov; Zoran Cerovac; Alexander Lushnikov; Yuri L Lyubchenko
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2003 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 10.  The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations.

Authors:  Andrew R Collins
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.860

View more
  22 in total

1.  Predicting attenuation of solar radiation (UV-B, UV-A and PAR) in waste stabilization ponds under Sahelian climatic conditions.

Authors:  Ynoussa Maiga; Joseph Wethé; Aboubakar Sidiki Ouattara; Alfred S Traoré
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Fabrication and characterization of UV-emitting nanoparticles as novel radiation sensitizers targeting hypoxic tumor cells.

Authors:  Michael R Squillante; Thomas Jüstel; R Rox Anderson; Charles Brecher; Daniel Chartier; James F Christian; Nicholas Cicchetti; Sara Espinoza; Daniel R McAdams; Matthias Müller; Brooke Tornifoglio; Yimin Wang; Martin Purschke
Journal:  Opt Mater (Amst)       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.080

Review 3.  UV wavelength-dependent DNA damage and human non-melanoma and melanoma skin cancer.

Authors:  Gerd P Pfeifer; Ahmad Besaratinia
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Wavelength dependence of ultraviolet radiation-induced DNA damage as determined by laser irradiation suggests that cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers are the principal DNA lesions produced by terrestrial sunlight.

Authors:  Ahmad Besaratinia; Jae-In Yoon; Christi Schroeder; Stephen E Bradforth; Myles Cockburn; Gerd P Pfeifer
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Investigating DNA Radiation Damage Using X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Joanna Czapla-Masztafiak; Jakub Szlachetko; Christopher J Milne; Ewelina Lipiec; Jacinto Sá; Thomas J Penfold; Thomas Huthwelker; Camelia Borca; Rafael Abela; Wojciech M Kwiatek
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Separating DNA with different topologies by atomic force microscopy in comparison with gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Mahir Rabbi; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Piotr E Marszalek
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimer Density as a Predictive Biomarker of the Biological Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation in Normal Human Fibroblast.

Authors:  Christopher D Sproul; David L Mitchell; Shangbang Rao; Joseph G Ibrahim; William K Kaufmann; Marila Cordeiro-Stone
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 8.  Sun exposure, sunbeds and sunscreens and melanoma. What are the controversies?

Authors:  Veronique Bataille
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  UVA-induced DNA double-strand breaks result from the repair of clustered oxidative DNA damages.

Authors:  R Greinert; B Volkmer; S Henning; E W Breitbart; K O Greulich; M C Cardoso; Alexander Rapp
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Comparison of the laboratory standard washing using CIPAC washing agent and the domestic washing on three recommended types of long-lasting insecticidal mosquito nets.

Authors:  Jean Pierre Nabléni Ouattara; Johanna Louwagie; Olivier Pigeon; Pieter Spanoghe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.