Literature DB >> 19185247

Intermediate optimization of vision with bilateral nonaspheric multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

John F Blaylock, Zhaomin Si, Cheryl Prescott, Sandi Aitchison.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate binocular visual function, refraction, and subjective outcomes of intermediate optimization of vision after simultaneous bilateral implantation of the nonaspheric AcrySof SA60D3 ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lens (IOL).
SETTING: Private clinic, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada.
METHODS: Intermediate optimization was performed by overcorrection of 1.00 diopter (D) to induce mild myopia in the nondominant eye in patients having bilateral implantation of the multifocal IOL. Distance manifest refraction and visual acuity at several distances were determined; contrast sensitivity function (CSF), near-point stereo acuity, and subjective outcomes were assessed postoperatively at 2 weeks and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.
RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with intended intermediate optimization and 5 patients with unintended intermediate optimization were prospectively evaluated. The mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent was stable from 2 weeks (-0.94 D+/-0.22 [SD]) to 12 months (-0.93+/-0.23 D) in the intermediate optimization eyes. Overall, postoperative mean binocular uncorrected near, intermediate, and distance visual acuities were 20/23, 20/23, and 20/22, respectively. No significant differences were found between best distance-corrected and uncorrected stereo acuity or between best distance-corrected and uncorrected binocular CSF under most conditions (P> .05). On questioning, 97% of patients had little or no difficulty seeing and were bothered occasionally or never by the visual fluctuation between the near range and intermediate range.
CONCLUSION: Intermediate optimization with slight myopia in 1 eye after bilateral implantation of the multifocal IOL offered consistent good vision at all ranges, indicating it a safe option for patients who require good vision at intermediate ranges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19185247     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.10.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  4 in total

1.  Visual outcome and optical quality after bilateral implantation of aspheric diffractive multifocal, aspheric monofocal and spherical monofocal intraocular lenses: a prospective comparison.

Authors:  Pan-Pan Ye; Xia Li; Ke Yao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Visual outcomes after bilateral trifocal diffractive intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Jesús Carballo-Alvarez; Jose M Vazquez-Molini; Juan C Sanz-Fernandez; Javier Garcia-Bella; Vicente Polo; Julián García-Feijoo; Jose M Martinez-de-la-Casa
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 2.209

3.  Vision with different presbyopia corrections simulated with a portable binocular visual simulator.

Authors:  Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Daniel Pascual; Susana Marcos; Carlos Dorronsoro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Visual and refractive outcomes after implantation of a fully diffractive trifocal lens.

Authors:  Béatrice Cochener; Jérome Vryghem; Pascal Rozot; Gilles Lesieur; Steven Heireman; Johan A Blanckaert; Emmanuel Van Acker; Sofie Ghekiere
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.