Literature DB >> 19185053

Evolutionary constraints on hub and non-hub proteins in human protein interaction network: insight from protein connectivity and intrinsic disorder.

Baisali Manna1, Tanusree Bhattacharya, Bratati Kahali, Tapash Chandra Ghosh.   

Abstract

It has been claimed that proteins with more interacting partners (hubs) are structurally more disordered and have a slow evolutionary rate. Here, in this paper we analyzed the evolutionary rate and structural disorderness of human hub and non-hub proteins present/absent in protein complexes. We observed that both non-hub and hub proteins present in protein complexes, are characterized by high structural disorderness. There exists no significant difference in average evolutionary rate of complex-forming hub and non-hub proteins while we have found a significant difference in the average evolutionary rate between hub and non-hub proteins which are not present in protein complexes. We concluded that higher disorderness in complex forming non-hub proteins facilitates higher number of interactions with a large number of protein subunits. High interaction among protein subunits of complex forming non-hub proteins imposes a selective constraint on their evolutionary rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19185053     DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2008.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  17 in total

1.  Connectedness of PPI network neighborhoods identifies regulatory hub proteins.

Authors:  Andrew D Fox; Benjamin J Hescott; Anselm C Blumer; Donna K Slonim
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  The relationships among microRNA regulation, intrinsically disordered regions, and other indicators of protein evolutionary rate.

Authors:  Sean Chun-Chang Chen; Trees-Juen Chuang; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Exploring the binding diversity of intrinsically disordered proteins involved in one-to-many binding.

Authors:  Wei-Lun Hsu; Christopher J Oldfield; Bin Xue; Jingwei Meng; Fei Huang; Pedro Romero; Vladimir N Uversky; A Keith Dunker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Intrinsic disorder and protein multibinding in domain, terminal, and linker regions.

Authors:  Jessica H Fong; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2010-06-11

5.  Protein connectivity and protein complexity promotes human gene duplicability in a mutually exclusive manner.

Authors:  Tanusree Bhattacharya; Tapash Chandra Ghosh
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 4.458

6.  Insights into the evolutionary features of human neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Arup Panda; Tina Begum; Tapash Chandra Ghosh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Predicting the binding patterns of hub proteins: a study using yeast protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Carson M Andorf; Vasant Honavar; Taner Z Sen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Protein complex forming ability is favored over the features of interacting partners in determining the evolutionary rates of proteins in the yeast protein-protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Sandip Chakraborty; Bratati Kahali; Tapash C Ghosh
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-11-12

9.  Network archaeology: uncovering ancient networks from present-day interactions.

Authors:  Saket Navlakha; Carl Kingsford
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Encoding asymmetry of the N-glycosylation motif facilitates glycoprotein evolution.

Authors:  Ryan Williams; Xiangyuan Ma; Ryan K Schott; Naveed Mohammad; Chi Yip Ho; Carey F Li; Belinda S W Chang; Michael Demetriou; James W Dennis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.