Literature DB >> 19184498

Exposure of medical students to pharmaceutical marketing in primary care settings: frequent and influential.

Ozlem Sarikaya1, Murat Civaner, Kevser Vatansever.   

Abstract

It is known that interaction between pharmaceutical companies and medical professionals may lead to corruption of professional values, irrational use of medicine, and negative effects on the patient-physician relationship. Medical students frequently interact with pharmaceutical company representatives and increasingly accept their gifts. Considering the move toward early clinical encounters and community-based education, which expose students early to pharmaceutical representatives, the influence of those gifts is becoming a matter of concern. This study examines the frequency and influence of student exposure to drug marketing in primary care settings, as well as student perceptions of physician-pharmaceutical company relationships. This was a two-phase study consisting of qualitative research followed by a cross-sectional survey. Clinical experience logbooks of 280 second-year students in one school were analysed, and the themes that emerged were used to develop a survey that was administered to 308 third-year students from two medical schools. Survey results showed a 91.2% exposure to any type of marketing, and 56.8% of students were exposed to all classes of marketing methods studied. Deliberate targeting of students by pharmaceutical representatives, in particular, was correlated with being less sensitive to the negative effects of and having positive opinions about interactions with pharmaceutical companies. The vast majority of students are exposed to drug marketing in primary care settings, and may become more vulnerable to that strategy. Considering that medical students are vulnerable and are targeted deliberately by pharmaceutical companies, interventions aimed at developing skills in the rational use of medicines and in strategies for coping with drug marketing should be devised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19184498     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-009-9153-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  8 in total

Review 1.  Medical students' exposure to and attitudes about the pharmaceutical industry: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kirsten E Austad; Jerry Avorn; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 11.069

2.  Pharmacists' and physicians' perception and exposure to drug promotion: A Saudi study.

Authors:  Noha M Zaki
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  Interaction and medical inducement between pharmaceutical representatives and physicians: a meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Shahrzad Salmasi; Long Chiau Ming; Tahir Mehmood Khan
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2016-11-17

4.  Turkish Final Year Medical Students' Exposure to and Attitudes Concerning Drug Company Interactions: A Perspective from a Minimally Regulated Environment for Medical Students.

Authors:  Nazim Ercument Beyhun; Cevriye Ceyda Kolayli; Gamze Can; Murat Topbas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Exposure to the drug company marketing in Greece: Interactions and attitudes in a non-regulated environment for medical students.

Authors:  Magdalini Filippiadou; Dimitrios Kouvelas; Georgios Garyfallos; Ioannis Tsakiridis; Dimitrios Tzachanis; Dimitrios Spachos; Georgios Papazisis
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2017-05-29

6.  Medical students' attitudes toward interactions with the pharmaceutical industry: a national survey in Japan.

Authors:  Sayaka Saito; Takami Maeno; Yasushi Miyata; Tetsuhiro Maeno
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Attitudes of medical students towards incentives offered by pharmaceutical companies -- perspective from a developing nation -- a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Usman Tariq Siddiqui; Amarah Shakoor; Sarah Kiani; Farwa Ali; Maryam Sharif; Arun Kumar; Qasim Raza; Naseer Khan; Sardar Mohammed Alamzaib; Syed Farid-ul-Husnain
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  A follow-up study on the effects of an educational intervention against pharmaceutical promotion.

Authors:  M Murat Civaner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.