Literature DB >> 19184195

The clinical practice of interventional radiology: a European perspective.

Aoife N Keeling1, Jim A Reekers, Michael J Lee.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the current clinical environment in which interventional radiology (IR) is practiced throughout Europe. A survey, comprising 12 questions on IR clinical practice, was sent to 1800 CIRSE members. Members were asked to return one survey per department. Two hundred seventy-four departments returned completed questionnaires, 22% from the United Kingdom (n = 60), 11% from Germany (n = 30), 8% from Austria (n = 23), and the remainder spread over Europe. Experts, with more than 10 years of IR experience, comprised 74% of the survey group. Almost one-third of the radiologists dedicated more than 80% of their clinical sessions to IR alone (27%; n = 75), with two-thirds practicing in a university teaching hospital setting (66%; n = 179). Few institutions have dedicated IR inpatient hospital beds (17%; n = 46), however, to compensate, day case beds are available (31%), IR admitting rights are in place (64% overall, 86% for in-patients, and 89% for day cases), and elective IR admissions can be made through other clinicians (87%). IR outpatient clinics are run at 26% of departments, with an average of two sessions per week. Dedicated nurses staff the majority of IR suites (82%), but clinical junior doctors are lacking (46%). Hospital management's refusing access to beds was the most commonly cited reason for not developing a clinical IR service (41%). In conclusion, there is marked variation across European centers in the current practice of IR. Half do not have dedicated junior doctors and only a small minority have inpatient hospital beds. If IR is to be maintained as a dedicated clinical specialty, these issues need to be addressed urgently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19184195     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-009-9503-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Recanalization of the lower leg: PTA or stent?].

Authors:  S Müller-Hülsbeck
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  The future of interventional and neurointerventional radiology: learning lessons from the past.

Authors:  Julian Maingard; Hong Kuan Kok; Dinesh Ranatunga; Duncan Mark Brooks; Ronil V Chandra; Michael J Lee; Hamed Asadi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Uterine fibroid embolisation for symptomatic uterine fibroids: a survey of clinical practice in Europe.

Authors:  Marianne J Voogt; Mark J Arntz; Paul N M Lohle; Willem P Th M Mali; Leo E H Lampmann
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Interventional Radiology in China: Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  He Zhao; Jiay-Wei Tsauo; Xiao-Wu Zhang; Xiao Li
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Clinical and endovascular practice in interventional radiology: a contemporary European analysis.

Authors:  Hong Kuan Kok; Thomas Rodt; Fabrizio Fanelli; Mohamad Hamady; Stefan Müller-Hülsbeck; Miquel Casares Santiago; Florian Wolf; Michael J Lee
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2018-06-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.