Literature DB >> 19184185

Dynamics and nutritional ecology of a nanoflagellate preying upon bacteria.

James P Grover1, Thomas H Chrzanowski.   

Abstract

Ingestion and growth rates of the nanoflagellate predator Ochromonas danica feeding on the bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens were quantified in laboratory cultures. Bacterial prey were grown under four nutritional conditions with respect to macronutrient elements: C-limited, N-limited, P-limited, and balanced. Ingestion and growth rates were saturating functions of prey abundance when preying upon nutritionally balanced, C-limited, and P-limited bacteria but were unimodal functions of abundance when preying on N-limited bacteria. At saturating prey concentrations, the ingestion rate of C-limited prey was about twice that of prey in other nutritional states, while at subsaturating prey concentrations, the ingestion rates of both C- and N-limited prey were higher than those of prey in other nutritional states. Over all prey concentrations, growth was most rapid on balanced and C-limited prey and generally lowest for P-limited prey. Due to the unimodal response of growth rate to abundance of N-limited prey, growth rate on N-limited prey approached that obtained on balanced and C-limited prey when prey were available at intermediate abundances. The accumulation of recycled N increased with the growth rate of O. danica. Recycling of N was highest when O. danica was feeding upon P-limited prey. The accumulation of recycled P increased with growth rate for balanced and N-limited prey, but not for P-limited prey, which consistently had low accumulation of recycled P. The low growth rate and negligible recycling of P for O. danica preying on P-limited prey is consistent with the theory of ecological stoichiometry and resembles results found for crustacean zooplankton, especially in the genus Daphnia. Potentially, the major predators of bacterioplankton and a major predator of phytoplankton play analogous roles in the trophic dynamics and biogeochemistry of aquatic ecosystems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19184185     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-009-9486-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  9 in total

1.  Prey selectivity and the influence of prey carbon:nitrogen ratio on microflagellate grazing.

Authors:  E H. John; K Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Mar Bio Ecol       Date:  2001-05-31       Impact factor: 2.171

Review 2.  Significance of predation by protists in aquatic microbial food webs.

Authors:  Evelyn B Sherr; Barry F Sherr
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.271

3.  The impact of variable stoichiometry on predator-prey interactions: a multinutrient approach.

Authors:  James P Grover
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Use of monodispersed, fluorescently labeled bacteria to estimate in situ protozoan bacterivory.

Authors:  B F Sherr; E B Sherr; R D Fallon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Technique for enumeration of heterotrophic and phototrophic nanoplankton, using epifluorescence microscopy, and comparison with other procedures.

Authors:  D A Caron
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Prey food quality affects flagellate ingestion rates.

Authors:  S Paul Shannon; Thomas H Chrzanowski; James P Grover
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Bacterivory and herbivory: Key roles of phagotrophic protists in pelagic food webs.

Authors:  E B Sherr; B F Sherr
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Particle handling during interception feeding by four species of heterotrophic nanoflagellates.

Authors:  J Boenigk; H Arndt
Journal:  J Eukaryot Microbiol       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  Regeneration of phosphorus and nitrogen by four species of heterotrophic nanoflagellates feeding on three nutritional States of a single bacterial strain.

Authors:  J D Eccleston-Parry; B Leadbeater
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.792

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  The renaissance of continuous culture in the post-genomics age.

Authors:  Alan T Bull
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Feedbacks between protistan single-cell activity and bacterial physiological structure reinforce the predator/prey link in microbial foodwebs.

Authors:  Eva Sintes; Paul A Del Giorgio
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  A tale of two mixotrophic chrysophytes: Insights into the metabolisms of two Ochromonas species (Chrysophyceae) through a comparison of gene expression.

Authors:  Alle A Y Lie; Zhenfeng Liu; Ramon Terrado; Avery O Tatters; Karla B Heidelberg; David A Caron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.