Literature DB >> 19184082

Macular autofluorescence in eyes with cystoid macula edema, detected with 488 nm-excitation but not with 580 nm-excitation.

Kenichiro Bessho1, Fumi Gomi, Seiyo Harino, Miki Sawa, Kaori Sayanagi, Motokazu Tsujikawa, Yasuo Tano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fundus autofluorescence (AF) derives from lipofuscin in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Because lipofuscin is a by-product of phagocytosis of photoreceptors by RPE, AF imaging is expected to describe some functional aspect of the retina. In this study we report distribution of AF in patients showing macular edema.
METHODS: Three eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) and 11 with retinal vein occlusion (RVO), associated with macular edema (ME) were examined. ME was determined by standard fundus examination, fluorescein angiography (FA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). AF was recorded using a Heidelberg confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (cSLO) with 488 nm laser exciter (488 nm-AF), and a conventional Topcon fundus camera with halogen lamp exciter and 580 nm band-pass filter (580 nm-AF). Color fundus picture, FA image and these two AF images were analyzed by superimposing all images.
RESULTS: All subjects presented cystoid macular edema (CME) with petaloid pattern hyperfluorescence in FA. In 488 nm-AF, all eyes (100%) showed macular autofluorescence of a similar shape to that of the CME in FA. In contrast, in 580 nm-AF only one eye (7%) presented this corresponding petaloid-shaped autofluorescence. In all cases, peripheral retinal edemas did not show autofluorescence corresponding to the leakage in FA.
CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with CME, analogous hyperautofluorescence to the CME was always observed in 488 nm-AF, while it was rarely observed in 580 nm-AF. Moreover, this CME hyperautofluorescence was only seen in the macular area. We hypothesize that autofluorescence from CME may be considered as a "pseudo" or "relative" autofluorescence, due to macular stretching following CME that may result in lateral displacement of macular pigments (MPs) and subsequent reduction of MPs density, as MPs block 488 nm-AF more intensely than 580 nm-AF. Although this phenomenon may not directly indicate change of RPE function, it may be used as a method to assess or track CME non-invasively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19184082     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-008-1033-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  25 in total

1.  Reproducibility of fundus autofluorescence measurements obtained using a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  N Lois; A S Halfyard; C Bunce; A C Bird; F W Fitzke
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Quantitative evaluation of fundus autofluorescence imaged "in vivo" in eyes with retinal disease.

Authors:  N Lois; A S Halfyard; A C Bird; F W Fitzke
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Temperature dependent fluorescence of A2-E, the main fluorescent lipofuscin component in the RPE.

Authors:  Carsten Framme; Georg Schüle; Reginald Birngruber; Johann Roider; Florian Schütt; Jürgen Kopitz; Frank G Holz; Ralf Brinkmann
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2004 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.424

4.  Drusen and disciform macular detachment and degeneration.

Authors:  J D Gass
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1973-09

5.  Abnormalities of fundus autofluorescence in central serous retinopathy.

Authors:  Andrea von Rückmann; Frederick W Fitzke; Joseph Fan; Anthony Halfyard; Alan C Bird
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Fundus autofluorescence in patients with age-related macular degeneration and high risk of visual loss.

Authors:  Noemi Lois; Sarah L Owens; Rosa Coco; Jill Hopkins; Frederick W Fitzke; Alan C Bird
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Imaging of retinal autofluorescence in patients with age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  U Solbach; C Keilhauer; H Knabben; S Wolf
Journal:  Retina       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  Spectral profiling of autofluorescence associated with lipofuscin, Bruch's Membrane, and sub-RPE deposits in normal and AMD eyes.

Authors:  Alan D Marmorstein; Lihua Y Marmorstein; Hirokazu Sakaguchi; Joe G Hollyfield
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Ocular fundus auto-fluorescence observations at different wavelengths in patients with age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Martin Hammer; Ekkehart Königsdörffer; Christiane Liebermann; Carsten Framme; Günter Schuch; Dietrich Schweitzer; Jürgen Strobel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  A2-rhodopsin: a new fluorophore isolated from photoreceptor outer segments.

Authors:  Nathan Fishkin; Young-Pyo Jang; Yasuhiro Itagaki; Janet R Sparrow; Koji Nakanishi
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 3.876

View more
  19 in total

1.  Macular pigment optical density spatial distribution measured in a subject with oculocutaneous albinism.

Authors:  Christopher M Putnam; Pauline J Bland
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-04-18

2.  Clinical relevance of quantified fundus autofluorescence in diabetic macular oedema.

Authors:  S Yoshitake; T Murakami; A Uji; N Unoki; Y Dodo; T Horii; N Yoshimura
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  Multimodal retinal imaging of diabetic macular edema: toward new paradigms of pathophysiology.

Authors:  Edoardo Midena; Silvia Bini
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Fundus autofluorescence findings in central serous chorioretinopathy using two different confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopes: correlation with functional and structural status.

Authors:  Joo Youn Shin; Hun Jin Choi; Jonghyun Lee; Moonjung Choi; Byunghoon Chung; Suk Ho Byeon
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Fundus autofluorescence imaging: systematic review of test accuracy for the diagnosis and monitoring of retinal conditions.

Authors:  G K Frampton; N Kalita; L Payne; J L Colquitt; E Loveman; S M Downes; A J Lotery
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Comparison of fundus autofluorescence images acquired by the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (488 nm excitation) and the modified Topcon fundus camera (580 nm excitation).

Authors:  A Deli; L Moetteli; A Ambresin; I Mantel
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Comparison of fundus autofluorescence between fundus camera and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope-based systems.

Authors:  Sung Pyo Park; Frank S Siringo; Noelle Pensec; In Hwan Hong; Janet Sparrow; Gaetano Barile; Stephen H Tsang; Stanley Chang
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.300

8.  Granular lesions of short-wavelength and near-infrared autofluorescence in diabetic macular oedema.

Authors:  Shin Yoshitake; Tomoaki Murakami; Akihito Uji; Masahiro Fujimoto; Yoko Dodo; Kiyoshi Suzuma; Akitaka Tsujikawa
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Comparison of macular pigment in three types of macular telangiectasia.

Authors:  Miki Sawa; Fumi Gomi; Chikako Ueno; Mihoko Suzuki; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Autofluorescence Imaging for Diagnosis and Follow-up of Cystoid Macular Edema.

Authors:  Nazanin Ebrahimiadib; Mohammad Riazi-Esfahani
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2012-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.