Literature DB >> 19184025

[Diagnostics of microcalcifications from minimally invasive biopsies in mammography screening: results from the prevalence phase].

D Hungermann1, S Weigel, E Korsching, W Heindel, W Böcker, T Decker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In mammography screening programmes carried out according to European guidelines, minimally invasive biopsies (MIB) are performed on up to 3% of participants. The aim of this study was to analyse the spectrum of histopathological findings including B categories in MIBs with microcalcifications compared to MIBs without microcalcifications.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospectively collected histological findings of MIBs taken during the period July 2006 to June 2007 were analysed using the Breast Screening Pathology Database of the Reference Centre in Münster.
RESULTS: Of the 4,326 MIBs investigated, 2,161 were benign (B1-B3) whereas 2,165 were malignant (B4-B5) resulting in an overall malignancy rate of 50.04%. Of the MIBs 1,809 contained microcalcifications and 2,517 did not. Cases with microcalcifications showed a different distribution of B categories: B2 was found in 44.5% versus 24.2%, B3 in 18.2% versus 5.5% and the malignancy rate of cases with microcalcifications was 36.8% versus 59.5%. Of all cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) detected in the screening programme, 83.35% were diagnosed in MIBs containing microcalcifications.
CONCLUSIONS: MIBs containing microcalcifications showed a different spectrum of diagnoses, especially higher rates of B3 lesions. Even though MIBs without microcalcifications showed a higher overall malignancy rate, most cases of DCIS were diagnosed in MIB containing microcalcifications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19184025     DOI: 10.1007/s00292-008-1100-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathologe        ISSN: 0172-8113            Impact factor:   1.011


  23 in total

1.  Examination of breast needle core biopsy specimens performed for screen-detected microcalcification.

Authors:  V Kumaraswamy; P J Carder
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1. Further confirmation with extended data.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Pathologic-radiologic correlations in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: findings of the Singapore breast screening project.

Authors:  P H Tan; J T Ho; E H Ng; G S Chiang; S C Low; F C Ng; B H Bay
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2000-08-20       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy.

Authors:  S G Orel; N Kay; C Reynolds; D C Sullivan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions.

Authors:  J E Meyer; D N Smith; S C Lester; C Kaelin; P J DiPiro; C M Denison; R L Christian; S C Harvey; D L Selland; S M Durfee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.

Authors:  L Liberman; A F Abramson; F B Squires; J R Glassman; E A Morris; D D Dershaw
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  V L Ernster; J Barclay; K Kerlikowske; D Grady; C Henderson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-03-27       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Screening caused rising incidence rates of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  L N van Steenbergen; A C Voogd; J A Roukema; W J Louwman; L E M Duijm; J W W Coebergh; L V van de Poll-Franse
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: estimates of overdiagnosis from two trials of mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephen W Duffy; Olorunsola Agbaje; Laszlo Tabar; Bedrich Vitak; Nils Bjurstam; Lena Björneld; Jonathan P Myles; Jane Warwick
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Pathological and biological differences between screen-detected and interval ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Marnix A de Roos; Bert van der Vegt; Jaap de Vries; Jelle Wesseling; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.