Literature DB >> 19183312

Point-of-care testing as a tool for screening for diabetes and pre-diabetes.

E Rush1, N Crook, D Simmons.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the utility of finger-prick point-of-care testing (POCT) of blood glucose for the detection of dysglycaemia.
METHODS: A fasting POCT and an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with laboratory assays were performed as part of the baseline screening for 5309 participants enrolled in the Te Wai o Rona Diabetes Prevention Strategy. Participants were aged 46 +/- 19 years with no self-reported diabetes. Dysglycaemia, including diabetes, was defined using World Health Organization criteria. Agreement between the two fasting plasma glucose measurements and their screening properties (with sensitivity and specificity for cut points) were compared using receiver operator characteristic analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 3225 participants had both capillary and venous fasting blood sampled within 30 min and then underwent OGTT. New diabetes was found in 161 participants (5.0%) and pre-diabetes in 414 [impaired glucose tolerance 299 (9.3%), impaired fasting glucose 115 (3.6%)]. The mean difference in capillary and venous measures was 0.02 mmol/l (95% confidence interval -0.04 to +0.01; limits of agreement -1.37 to 1.33 mmol/l). Capillary POCT was a poorer predictor of dysglycaemia and impaired glucose tolerance and new diabetes (area under curve 0.76 and 0.71) than venous laboratory analysis (area under curve 0.87 and 0.81 respectively). Optimal screening criteria were best at a venous glucose of 5.4 mmol/l; 77% sensitivity/specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: POCT significantly underestimated the true blood glucose at diagnostic levels for diabetes. POCT cannot be recommended as a means of screening for or diagnosing diabetes or pre-diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19183312     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02526.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  10 in total

1.  Fasting capillary blood glucose: an appropriate measurement in screening for diabetes and pre-diabetes in low-resource rural settings.

Authors:  X Zhao; W Zhao; H Zhang; J Li; Y Shu; S Li; L Cai; J Zhou; Y Li; R Hu
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Analysis of the Indian Council of Medical Research-India Diabetes (ICMR-INDIAB) study.

Authors:  K M Venkat Narayan; Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-07-01

3.  Glucose challenge test screening for prediabetes and early diabetes.

Authors:  S L Jackson; S E Safo; L R Staimez; D E Olson; K M V Narayan; Q Long; J Lipscomb; M K Rhee; P W F Wilson; A M Tomolo; L S Phillips
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 4.359

4.  Prevalence of diabetes mellitus among non institutionalized elderly in Monastir City.

Authors:  Sonia Hammami; Sounira Mehri; Said Hajem; Nadia Koubaa; Hala Souid; Mohamed Hammami
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 2.763

5.  Comparison of near-patient capillary glucose measurement and a risk assessment questionnaire in screening for type 2 diabetes in a high-risk population in rural India.

Authors:  Georgia E Ritchie; Andre Pascal Kengne; Rohina Joshi; Clara Chow; Bruce Neal; Anushka Patel; Sophia Zoungas
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Validation of Point-of-Care Glucose Testing for Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Marijana Vučić Lovrenčić; Vanja Radišić Biljak; Sandra Božičević; Edita Pape-Medvidović; Spomenka Ljubić
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 3.257

7.  Noncommunicable disease in rural India: Are we seriously underestimating the risk? The Nallampatti noncommunicable disease study.

Authors:  Krishnan Swaminathan; Ganesh Veerasekar; Sujatha Kuppusamy; Mohanraj Sundaresan; Ganesan Velmurugan; Nalla G Palaniswami
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

8.  Characteristics of participants who take up screening tests for diabetes and lipid disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hanyue Ding; Junjie Huang; Yunyang Deng; Sze Pui Pamela Tin; Martin Chi-Sang Wong; Eng-Kiong Yeoh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 9.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Response Rates and Diagnostic Yield of Screening for Type 2 Diabetes and Those at High Risk of Diabetes.

Authors:  Kamlesh Khunti; Hamidreza Mani; Felix Achana; Nicola Cooper; Laura J Gray; Melanie J Davies
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Pregnancy diabetes: A comparison of diagnostic protocols based on point-of-care, routine and optimized laboratory conditions.

Authors:  Sjoerd A A van den Berg; Monique J M de Groot; Lorenzo P W Salden; Patrick J G J Draad; Ineke M Dijkstra; Simone Lunshof; Sjoerd W van Thiel; Kristel J M Boonen; Marc H M Thelen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.