Vicki Chrysostomou1, Krisztina Valter, Jonathan Stone. 1. Research School of Biological Sciences, and the ARC Centre of Excellence in Vision Science, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. vicki.chrysostomou@anu.edu.au
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of accelerated rod damage on the integrity of cones in the rat retina. METHODS: Rhodopsin-mutant P23H-3 and Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were raised in scotopic ambient conditions (12 hours dark, 12 hours 5 lux) and then exposed to photopic conditions (12 hours dark, 12 hours 300 lux). Rods and cones were assessed for cell death, outer segment (OS) morphology, and electroretinogram (ERG) responses. RESULTS: Cones in the P23H-retina were affected rapidly by photopic exposure. Exposure for 2 days caused 50% reductions in LM- and S-cone OS length and cone ERG responses, associated with and preceded by reductions in rod OS length and ERG responses. Although 2 days' exposure increased the rate of rod death, outer nuclear layer thinning was minimal, and no evidence of cone death was detected. In the SD retina, the same photopic exposure had no measurable effects on death rates, OS length, or ERG responses in either rods or cones. Longer (7 days) photopic exposure reduced cone and rod OS length and ERG responses in SD, as well as P23H-3 retinas, but less severely than in the P23H-3 strain. CONCLUSIONS: Cones are damaged rapidly in the P23H-3 retina when rod damage is accelerated by raised ambient illumination. This close dependence of cone integrity on rod integrity contrasts with the life-long persistence of cone function in the scotopic reared P23H-3 rat. In humans suffering comparable photoreceptor dystrophies, the maintenance of steady, low ambient light may, by minimizing acute rod damage, optimize the function of surviving cones.
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of accelerated rod damage on the integrity of cones in the rat retina. METHODS:Rhodopsin-mutant P23H-3 and Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were raised in scotopic ambient conditions (12 hours dark, 12 hours 5 lux) and then exposed to photopic conditions (12 hours dark, 12 hours 300 lux). Rods and cones were assessed for cell death, outer segment (OS) morphology, and electroretinogram (ERG) responses. RESULTS: Cones in the P23H-retina were affected rapidly by photopic exposure. Exposure for 2 days caused 50% reductions in LM- and S-cone OS length and cone ERG responses, associated with and preceded by reductions in rod OS length and ERG responses. Although 2 days' exposure increased the rate of rod death, outer nuclear layer thinning was minimal, and no evidence of cone death was detected. In the SD retina, the same photopic exposure had no measurable effects on death rates, OS length, or ERG responses in either rods or cones. Longer (7 days) photopic exposure reduced cone and rod OS length and ERG responses in SD, as well as P23H-3 retinas, but less severely than in the P23H-3 strain. CONCLUSIONS: Cones are damaged rapidly in the P23H-3 retina when rod damage is accelerated by raised ambient illumination. This close dependence of cone integrity on rod integrity contrasts with the life-long persistence of cone function in the scotopic reared P23H-3 rat. In humans suffering comparable photoreceptor dystrophies, the maintenance of steady, low ambient light may, by minimizing acute rod damage, optimize the function of surviving cones.
Authors: Matthew M LaVail; Shimpei Nishikawa; Roy H Steinberg; Muna I Naash; Jacque L Duncan; Nikolaus Trautmann; Michael T Matthes; Douglas Yasumura; Cathy Lau-Villacorta; Jeannie Chen; Ward M Peterson; Haidong Yang; John G Flannery Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2017-11-06 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Trevor J McGill; Glen T Prusky; Robert M Douglas; Douglas Yasumura; Michael T Matthes; Robert J Lowe; Jacque L Duncan; Haidong Yang; Kelly Ahern; Kate M Daniello; Byron Silver; Matthew M LaVail Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Artur V Cideciyan; Rivka A Rachel; Tomas S Aleman; Malgorzata Swider; Sharon B Schwartz; Alexander Sumaroka; Alejandro J Roman; Edwin M Stone; Samuel G Jacobson; Anand Swaroop Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2011-01-18 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Yiwen Li; Weng Tao; Lingyu Luo; Deqiang Huang; Konrad Kauper; Paul Stabila; Matthew M Lavail; Alan M Laties; Rong Wen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-03-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alix Trouillet; Elisabeth Dubus; Julie Dégardin; Amrit Estivalet; Ivana Ivkovic; David Godefroy; Diego García-Ayuso; Manuel Simonutti; Iman Sahly; José A Sahel; Aziz El-Amraoui; Christine Petit; Serge Picaud Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: John D Rodriguez; Keith Lane; David A Hollander; Aron Shapiro; Sunita Saigal; Andrew J Hertsenberg; Garrick Wallstrom; Divya Narayanan; Endri Angjeli; Mark B Abelson Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2018-07-27