Literature DB >> 19182136

The maze task: measuring forced incremental sentence processing time.

Kenneth I Forster1, Christine Guerrera2, Lisa Elliot2.   

Abstract

The maze task is an online measure of sentence processing time that provides an alternative to the standard moving window version of self-paced reading. Rather than each word of the sentence being presented in succession, two words are presented at the same time, and the participant must choose which word is a grammatical continuation of the sentence. This procedure forces the reader into an incremental mode of processing in which each word must be fully integrated with the preceding context before the next word can be considered. Previous research with this technique has not considered whether it is sufficiently sensitive to syntactic complexity effects or to garden path effects. Four experiments are reported demonstrating that reliable differences in processing time for subject relatives and object relatives can be obtained, and that this technique generates garden path effects that correspond closely with the data from eyetracking experiments, but without the spillover effects that are sometimes obtained with eyetracking. It is also shown that the task is sensitive to word frequency effects, producing estimates well in excess of those found with eyetracking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19182136     DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.1.163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  7 in total

1.  Comparisons of online reading paradigms: eye tracking, moving-window, and maze.

Authors:  Naoko Witzel; Jeffrey Witzel; Kenneth Forster
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-04

2.  Incremental Sentence Processing in Japanese: A Maze Investigation into Scrambled and Control Sentences.

Authors:  Jeffrey Witzel; Naoko Witzel
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-06

3.  The Impact of World Knowledge on the Processing of Mandarin Possessive Reflexive zijide.

Authors:  Rui Li; Zhiyi Zhang; Chuanbin Ni
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-06

4.  (Non-)Arguments in Long-Distance Extractions.

Authors:  Anne Mette Nyvad; Johannes Kizach; Ken Ramshøj Christensen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-10

5.  Lossy-Context Surprisal: An Information-Theoretic Model of Memory Effects in Sentence Processing.

Authors:  Richard Futrell; Edward Gibson; Roger P Levy
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-03

6.  Structure before meaning: sentence processing, plausibility, and subcategorization.

Authors:  Johannes Kizach; Anne Mette Nyvad; Ken Ramshøj Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Language control in bilingual language comprehension: evidence from the maze task.

Authors:  Xin Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.