Literature DB >> 19182126

Measuring discriminability when there are multiple sources of bias.

Glenn S Brown1, K Geoffrey White2.   

Abstract

Performance measures such as log d and d' aim to measure stimulus discriminability independently of response bias in conditional discrimination tasks, including the yes/no signal-detection procedure. However, they assume only one dimension of bias (e.g., response color) and do not account for bias on additional dimensions (e.g., response side). Such bias reduces log d, thus violating the statistical independence of discriminability and bias measurements. We modified log d to account for side bias and reanalyzed previous side-biased data. With strong side bias, the modified log d differed enough from the standard log d to potentially alter the conclusions of an experiment. Simulations showed that the modified log d produces discriminability estimates that are more accurate and bias-independent than the standard log d calculation.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19182126     DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.1.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  2 in total

1.  Matching-to-sample performance is better analyzed in terms of a four-term contingency than in terms of a three-term contingency.

Authors:  Brent M Jones; Douglas M Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Extraversion but not depression predicts reward sensitivity: Revisiting the measurement of anhedonic phenotypes.

Authors:  Scott D Blain; Tyler A Sassenberg; Muchen Xi; Daiqing Zhao; Colin G DeYoung
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2020-10-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.