Literature DB >> 19182090

Effect of age on stroke prevention therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: the atrial fibrillation investigators.

Carl van Walraven1, Robert G Hart, Stuart Connolly, Peter C Austin, Jonathan Mant, F D Richard Hobbs, Peter J Koudstaal, Palle Petersen, Francisco Perez-Gomez, J Andre Knottnerus, Beppie Boode, Michael D Ezekowitz, Daniel E Singer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Stroke risk increases with age in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. It is uncertain whether the efficacy of stroke prevention therapies in atrial fibrillation changes as patients age. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of age on the relative efficacy of oral anticoagulants (OAC) and antiplatelet (AP) therapy (including acetylsalicylic acid and triflusal) on ischemic stroke, serious bleeding, and vascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation.
METHODS: This is an analysis of the Atrial Fibrillation Investigators database, which contains patient level-data from randomized trials of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. We used Cox regression models with age as a continuous variable that controlled for sex, year of randomization, and history of cerebrovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, and congestive heart failure. Outcomes included ischemic stroke, serious bleeding (intracranial hemorrhage or systemic bleeding requiring hospitalization, transfusion, or surgery), and cardiovascular events (ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, or vascular death).
RESULTS: The analysis included 8932 patients and 17 685 years of observation from 12 trials. Patient age increased risk of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio per decade increase 1.45; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.66), serious bleeding (1.61; 1.47 to 1.77), and cardiovascular events (1.43; 1.33 to 1.53). Compared with placebo, OAC and AP significantly reduced the risk of ischemic stroke (OAC, 0.36; 0.29 to 0.45; AP, 0.81; 0.72 to 0.90) and cardiovascular outcomes (OAC, 0.59; 0.52 to 0.66; AP, 0.81; 0.75 to 0.88), whereas OAC increased risk of serious bleeding (1.56; 1.03 to 2.37). The relative benefit of OAC versus placebo or AP did not vary by patient age for any outcome. Compared with placebo, the relative benefit of AP for preventing ischemic stroke decreased significantly as patients aged (P=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: As patients with atrial fibrillation age, the relative efficacy of AP to prevent ischemic stroke appears to decrease, whereas it does not change for OAC. Because stroke risk increases with age, the absolute benefit of OAC increases as patients get older.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19182090     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.526988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  76 in total

1.  MEDEX South Carolina: a progress report.

Authors:  K J Buhmeyer; A R Hutson
Journal:  J S C Med Assoc       Date:  1975-11

2.  [Epidemiology, clinical picture and management of atrial fibrillation].

Authors:  J Röther
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Anticoagulation for stroke prevention in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: risk-benefit ratio remains highly favorable.

Authors:  Alberto Maud; Kamakshi Lakshminarayan; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2010-01

Review 4.  [New oral anticoagulants: better than vitamin K antagonists?].

Authors:  H Völler; S Alban; D Westermann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  "To treat or not to treat very elderly naïve patients with atrial fibrillation with vitamin K antagonists".

Authors:  Francesco Dentali; Nicola Mumoli; Monica Gianni; Marco Cei
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.397

6.  Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  John J You; Daniel E Singer; Patricia A Howard; Deirdre A Lane; Mark H Eckman; Margaret C Fang; Elaine M Hylek; Sam Schulman; Alan S Go; Michael Hughes; Frederick A Spencer; Warren J Manning; Jonathan L Halperin; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 7.  A tutorial on methods to estimating clinically and policy-meaningful measures of treatment effects in prospective observational studies: a review.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 0.968

Review 8.  Dabigatran etexilate: appropriate use in patients with chronic kidney disease and in the elderly patients.

Authors:  Mauro Molteni; Mario Bo; Giovanni Di Minno; Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Simonetta Genovesi; Danilo Toni; Paolo Verdecchia
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.397

9.  Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease in older patients.

Authors:  Connie N Hess; Samuel Broderick; Jonathan P Piccini; Karen P Alexander; L Kristin Newby; Linda K Shaw; Kenneth W Mahaffey; John H Alexander; Eric D Peterson; Christopher B Granger; Renato D Lopes
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 10.  Optimal loading dose for the initiation of warfarin: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carl Heneghan; Sally Tyndel; Clare Bankhead; Yi Wan; David Keeling; Rafael Perera; Alison Ward
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.