Literature DB >> 19182047

Effects of practice, visual loss, limb amputation, and disuse on motor imagery vividness.

Francine Malouin1, Carol L Richards, Anne Durand, Micheline Descent, Diane Poiré, Pierre Frémont, Stéphane Pelet, Jacques Gresset, Julien Doyon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to generate vivid images of movements is variable across individuals and likely influenced by sensorimotor inputs.
OBJECTIVES: The authors examined (1) the vividness of motor imagery in dancers and in persons with late blindness, with amputation or an immobilization of one lower limb; (2) the effects of prosthesis use on motor imagery; and (3) the temporal characteristics of motor imagery.
METHODS: Eleven dancers, 10 persons with late blindness, 14 with amputation, 6 with immobilization, and 2 groups of age-matched healthy individuals (27 in control group A; 35 in control group B) participated. The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire served to assess motor imagery vividness. Temporal characteristics were assessed with mental chronometry.
RESULTS: The late blindness group and dance group displayed higher imagery scores than respective control groups. In the amputation and immobilization groups, imagery scores were lower on the affected side than the intact side and specifically for imagined foot movements. Imagery scores of the affected limb positively correlated with the time since walking with prosthesis. Movement times during imagination and execution (amputation and immobilization) were longer on the affected side than the intact side, but the temporal congruence between real and imagined movement times was similar to that in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: The mental representation of actions is highly modulated by imagery practice and motor activities. The ability to generate vivid images of movements can be specifically weakened by limb loss or disuse, but lack of movement does not affect the temporal characteristics of motor imagery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19182047     DOI: 10.1177/1545968308328733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  15 in total

1.  Motor imagery practice may compensate for the slowdown of sensorimotor processes induced by short-term upper-limb immobilization.

Authors:  Aurore Meugnot; Nounagnon Frutueux Agbangla; Yves Almecija; Lucette Toussaint
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-06-08

2.  Patient-centered integrated motor imagery delivered in the home with telerehabilitation to improve walking after stroke.

Authors:  Judith E Deutsch; Inbal Maidan; Ruth Dickstein
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2012-04-12

3.  Functional brain effects of hand disuse in patients with trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: executed and imagined movements.

Authors:  Martina Gandola; Maurilio Bruno; Laura Zapparoli; Gianluca Saetta; Elena Rolandi; Antonio De Santis; Giuseppe Banfi; Alberto Zerbi; Valerio Sansone; Eraldo Paulesu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Impact of neurologic deficits on motor imagery: a systematic review of clinical evaluations.

Authors:  Franck Di Rienzo; Christian Collet; Nady Hoyek; Aymeric Guillot
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 5.  Best practice for motor imagery: a systematic literature review on motor imagery training elements in five different disciplines.

Authors:  Corina Schuster; Roger Hilfiker; Oliver Amft; Anne Scheidhauer; Brian Andrews; Jenny Butler; Udo Kischka; Thierry Ettlin
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Altered microstructure rather than morphology in the corpus callosum after lower limb amputation.

Authors:  Zhichao Li; Chuanming Li; Lingzhong Fan; Guangyao Jiang; Jixiang Wu; Tianzi Jiang; Xuntao Yin; Jian Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Neuroplasticity and functional recovery in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Valentina Tomassini; Paul M Matthews; Alan J Thompson; Daniel Fuglø; Jeroen J Geurts; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Derek K Jones; Maria A Rocca; Richard G Wise; Frederik Barkhof; Jacqueline Palace
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 42.937

8.  The effects of body position and actual execution on motor imagery of locomotor tasks in people with a lower-limb amputation.

Authors:  Arnaud Saimpont; Francine Malouin; Anne Durand; Catherine Mercier; Franck di Rienzo; Elodie Saruco; Christian Collet; Aymeric Guillot; Philip L Jackson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Training the motor cortex by observing the actions of others during immobilization.

Authors:  Michela Bassolino; Martina Campanella; Marco Bove; Thierry Pozzo; Luciano Fadiga
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Rhythmic cued motor imagery and walking in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  Barbara Seebacher; Raija Kuisma; Angela Glynn; Thomas Berger
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2015-07-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.