BACKGROUND: It is well recognized that physical activity (PA) is important for older adults; yet, clinicians remain pessimistic about the ability of older adults with compromised function to adhere to long-term treatment and to maintain behavior change once treatment has been terminated. METHODS: We examined the functional status of older adults at a field center (Wake Forest University) 2 years after completing 12 months of treatment in the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Pilot study. At baseline, participants were randomized to either a PA or a successful aging (SA) control group. Outcome measures included an interview assessment of PA, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and performance on a 400-m self-paced walking test. RESULTS: Two years after the formal intervention had ended, participants who were originally in the PA group continued to engage in more minutes of moderate PA and tended to have better SPPB and walking speed than those in the SA group (effect sizes [ES]: SPPB = 0.40, walking speed = 0.37). Seven (12.7%) participants in the PA group failed the 400-m walk at the 36-month follow-up assessment, whereas this number was 11 (21.6%) in the SA group. CONCLUSION:Older adults who have compromised physical function are able to sustain some of the benefits derived from participating in structured PA 2 years after supervised treatment has been terminated.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: It is well recognized that physical activity (PA) is important for older adults; yet, clinicians remain pessimistic about the ability of older adults with compromised function to adhere to long-term treatment and to maintain behavior change once treatment has been terminated. METHODS: We examined the functional status of older adults at a field center (Wake Forest University) 2 years after completing 12 months of treatment in the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Pilot study. At baseline, participants were randomized to either a PA or a successful aging (SA) control group. Outcome measures included an interview assessment of PA, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and performance on a 400-m self-paced walking test. RESULTS: Two years after the formal intervention had ended, participants who were originally in the PA group continued to engage in more minutes of moderate PA and tended to have better SPPB and walking speed than those in the SA group (effect sizes [ES]: SPPB = 0.40, walking speed = 0.37). Seven (12.7%) participants in the PA group failed the 400-m walk at the 36-month follow-up assessment, whereas this number was 11 (21.6%) in the SA group. CONCLUSION: Older adults who have compromised physical function are able to sustain some of the benefits derived from participating in structured PA 2 years after supervised treatment has been terminated.
Authors: Miriam E Nelson; W Jack Rejeski; Steven N Blair; Pamela W Duncan; James O Judge; Abby C King; Carol A Macera; Carmen Castaneda-Sceppa Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-08-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: W H Ettinger; R Burns; S P Messier; W Applegate; W J Rejeski; T Morgan; S Shumaker; M J Berry; M O'Toole; J Monu; T Craven Journal: JAMA Date: 1997-01-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: W Jack Rejeski; Lawrence R Brawley; Walter T Ambrosius; Peter H Brubaker; Brian C Focht; Capri G Foy; Lesley D Fox Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Miriam E Nelson; Jennifer E Layne; Melissa J Bernstein; Andrea Nuernberger; Carmen Castaneda; David Kaliton; Jeffrey Hausdorff; James O Judge; David M Buchner; Ronenn Roubenoff; Maria A Fiatarone Singh Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Gordon R Reeves; David J Whellan; Pamela Duncan; Christopher M O'Connor; Amy M Pastva; Joel D Eggebeen; Leigh Ann Hewston; Timothy M Morgan; Shelby D Reed; W Jack Rejeski; Robert J Mentz; Paul B Rosenberg; Dalane W Kitzman Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2016-12-28 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Caterina Rosano; Vijay K Venkatraman; Jack Guralnik; Anne B Newman; Nancy W Glynn; Lenore Launer; Christopher A Taylor; Jeff Williamson; Stephanie Studenski; Marco Pahor; Howard Aizenstein Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2010-03-26 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Thomas R Wójcicki; Jason Fanning; Elizabeth A Awick; Erin A Olson; Robert W Motl; Edward McAuley Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Anthony P Marsh; Abbie P Wrights; Eric H Haakonssen; Meredith A Dobrosielski; Elizabeth A Chmelo; Ryan T Barnard; Anthony Pecorella; Edward H Ip; W Jack Rejeski Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Mélany Hars; François R Herrmann; Roger A Fielding; Kieran F Reid; René Rizzoli; Andrea Trombetti Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2014-08-23 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Joshua D Brown; Ching-Yu Wang; Erik J Groessl; Marco Pahor; Todd M Manini Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2021-01-18 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Sarah Roberts; Elizabeth Awick; Jason T Fanning; Diane Ehlers; Robert W Motl; Edward McAuley Journal: J Aging Phys Act Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 1.961