BACKGROUND: Defect reconstruction according to the free-style concept applied to perforator flaps allows flap harvesting in any anatomical region where an audible Doppler signal of a perforator is detected. We report the results of a study in which local perforator flaps were selected for reconstruction in different anatomical areas and were harvested using the free-style concept. METHODS: During a 2-year period, defect coverage was carried out in 21 patients (n=21) in the following anatomical areas: cervical (n=3), sternal/parasternal (n=4), axillary (n=2), tibial (n=5), trochanteric (n=2) and sacral/gluteal (n=5). The mean age of patients (15 male and six female) was 57.8 years. Flap selection was based solely on preoperative Doppler mapping in areas adjacent to soft-tissue defects. The mean follow-up period was 1 year. RESULTS: All flaps survived, demonstrating postoperatively acceptable aesthetic results with good patient satisfaction. The donor sites were closed primarily in 17 patients; four patients required skin grafting. Two patients required surgical revision due to flap-margin dehiscence. There was no loss of function at donor sites. Increased flap mobility could be achieved through extended perforator dissection. One perforator-based flaps offered the widest arc of rotation serving as propeller flaps. If more than one perforator vessel was preserved, flap mobility was limited, but still allowed sufficient flap movement either as a rotation or advancement flap or as a combination of both. A classification is proposed according to the number of perforator vessels preserved and to the type of flap movement. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of free-style local perforator flaps represents a safe, versatile and reliable surgical procedure. It not only offers a greater freedom in flap selection but also provides good aesthetic results. The classification proposed might aid in the decision-making process involved in order to achieve adequate results with this procedure.
BACKGROUND: Defect reconstruction according to the free-style concept applied to perforator flaps allows flap harvesting in any anatomical region where an audible Doppler signal of a perforator is detected. We report the results of a study in which local perforator flaps were selected for reconstruction in different anatomical areas and were harvested using the free-style concept. METHODS: During a 2-year period, defect coverage was carried out in 21 patients (n=21) in the following anatomical areas: cervical (n=3), sternal/parasternal (n=4), axillary (n=2), tibial (n=5), trochanteric (n=2) and sacral/gluteal (n=5). The mean age of patients (15 male and six female) was 57.8 years. Flap selection was based solely on preoperative Doppler mapping in areas adjacent to soft-tissue defects. The mean follow-up period was 1 year. RESULTS: All flaps survived, demonstrating postoperatively acceptable aesthetic results with good patient satisfaction. The donor sites were closed primarily in 17 patients; four patients required skin grafting. Two patients required surgical revision due to flap-margin dehiscence. There was no loss of function at donor sites. Increased flap mobility could be achieved through extended perforator dissection. One perforator-based flaps offered the widest arc of rotation serving as propeller flaps. If more than one perforator vessel was preserved, flap mobility was limited, but still allowed sufficient flap movement either as a rotation or advancement flap or as a combination of both. A classification is proposed according to the number of perforator vessels preserved and to the type of flap movement. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of free-style local perforator flaps represents a safe, versatile and reliable surgical procedure. It not only offers a greater freedom in flap selection but also provides good aesthetic results. The classification proposed might aid in the decision-making process involved in order to achieve adequate results with this procedure.
Authors: Osman Kelahmetoglu; Koenraad Van Landuyt; Caglayan Yagmur; Casper E Sommeling; Musa K Keles; Volkan Tayfur; Tekin Simsek; Yener Demirtas; Ethem Guneren Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Emre A Kocman; Fatih N Yaşar; Aydan A Kose; Yakup Cil; Yakup Karabagli; Cengiz Çetin Journal: Indian J Surg Date: 2015-02-08 Impact factor: 0.656