Literature DB >> 19181546

Barking in family dogs: an ethological approach.

Péter Pongrácz1, Csaba Molnár, Adám Miklósi.   

Abstract

Although it is one of the most conspicuous features of dog behaviour, barking has received little attention from ethologists or from an applied perspective. In this review, an ethological look is taken at the communicative aspect of dog barking. Emerging new research has indicated that in the repertoire of dog vocalisations barking has unique features in showing wide ranges of acoustic parameters, such as frequency, tonality and rhythmicity. Barking has been shown to be context dependent, and provides information for humans about the inner state of the dog although there are few indications that barking is used for intra-species communication. It is assumed that dog barking emerged through selective processes in which human preferences for certain acoustic aspects of the vocalisation may have been paramount. A more experiment-oriented approach is required for the study of dog vocalisation that could shed light on the possible communicative function of these acoustic signals. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19181546     DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet J        ISSN: 1090-0233            Impact factor:   2.688


  12 in total

1.  Humans rely on the same rules to assess emotional valence and intensity in conspecific and dog vocalizations.

Authors:  Tamás Faragó; Attila Andics; Viktor Devecseri; Anna Kis; Márta Gácsi; Adám Miklósi
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Evolutionary approach to communication between humans and dogs.

Authors:  A Miklósi
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Dog growls express various contextual and affective content for human listeners.

Authors:  T Faragó; N Takács; Á Miklósi; P Pongrácz
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 4.  Communication in Dogs.

Authors:  Marcello Siniscalchi; Serenella d'Ingeo; Michele Minunno; Angelo Quaranta
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Pawsitively sad: pet-owners are more sensitive to negative emotion in animal distress vocalizations.

Authors:  Christine E Parsons; Richard T LeBeau; Morten L Kringelbach; Katherine S Young
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  The voice of emotion across species: how do human listeners recognize animals' affective states?

Authors:  Marina Scheumann; Anna S Hasting; Sonja A Kotz; Elke Zimmermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Establishing a framework to understand the regulation and control of dogs in urban environments: a case study of Melbourne, Australia.

Authors:  Simon Bruce Carter
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-27

8.  Human Novelty Response to Emotional Animal Vocalizations: Effects of Phylogeny and Familiarity.

Authors:  Marina Scheumann; Anna S Hasting; Elke Zimmermann; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Resource-Efficient Pet Dog Sound Events Classification Using LSTM-FCN Based on Time-Series Data.

Authors:  Yunbin Kim; Jaewon Sa; Yongwha Chung; Daihee Park; Sungju Lee
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-18       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Surgical and Behavioral Relationships With Welfare.

Authors:  Melissa Bain
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-08-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.