Literature DB >> 19181500

[Impact of influenza rapid diagnostic tests (IRDT) on the diagnosis of influenza and on the management of influenza in children in ambulatory pediatric setting].

F de La Rocque1, A Lécuyer, C Wollner, P d'Athis, M Pecking, F Thollot, R Cohen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Several studies have highlighted the assets of the influenza rapid diagnostic tests (IRDT) for the emergency department management of febrile children. The objective of this study was to determine in ambulatory pediatric setting impact of IRDT on the management of febrile children during an epidemic, especially on other diagnostic testing performed, antibiotic and antiviral treatments.
METHODS: During an influenza epidemic, 37 paediatricians in three different areas of France included all children presenting fever with respiratory illnesses; they performed IRDT (test QuickVue for Influenza A and B, Quidel). Data collected were antiflu vaccination, previous asthma, symptoms, clinical signs, other diagnostic testing performed, and a follow-up two weeks later.
RESULTS: Between December, 2006 and April, 2007, 695 children entered the program. The average age of those children was 4.1 years old (SD 3.4), median 3.2 (0.07-17.5). In 41.6% of the cases, the tests proved positive. Among 13 symptoms of influenza, only five were significantly more present in the group IRDT+: shiver (68.1% versus 57.4%), asthenia (87% versus 79.9%), cough (87.5% versus 70.1%), rhinorrhea (93.4% versus 83.3%), and sleepiness (54.2% versus 43.4%). The number of laboratory tests and radiographs ordered were less frequent in group IRDT+ than in group IRDT-: respectively 0.7% versus 11.6%, and 0.7% versus 8.6% (p<0.0001). IRDT+ group received antibiotics in 7.6% of cases (22 patients, 20 for OMA) and antiviral in 64.7%. IRDT- group received respectively 18.5% antibiotics, and no antiviral (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: This study confirms the difficulty of clinical influenza diagnosis, and suggests the assets of IRDT to diagnose influenza and to improve the management of influenza in ambulatory paediatric setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19181500     DOI: 10.1016/j.arcped.2008.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr        ISSN: 0929-693X            Impact factor:   1.180


  5 in total

1.  Clinical performance of three rapid diagnostic tests for influenza virus in nasopharyngeal specimens to detect novel swine-origin influenza viruses.

Authors:  V Pongthanapisith; C Sukasem; K Premchaiporn; C Srichantaratsamee; W Chantratita
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Performance characteristics of a rapid immunochromatographic assay for detection of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus in children.

Authors:  Kristina Keitel; Noémie Wagner; Laurence Lacroix; Sergio Manzano; Alain Gervaix
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  The association between influenza treatment and hospitalization-associated outcomes among Korean children with laboratory-confirmed influenza.

Authors:  Jacqueline K Lim; Tae Hee Kim; Paul E Kilgore; Allison E Aiello; Byung Min Choi; Kwang Chul Lee; Kee Hwan Yoo; Young-Hwan Song; Yun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Clinical manifestations of influenza caused by A/H1N1v virus among children and teenagers consulted in general practice.

Authors:  Aneta Nitsch-Osuch; E Kuchar; E Gyrczuk; A Topczewska-Cabanek; K Zycinska; K Wardyn
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.175

5.  [Recommendations for the use of rapid diagnosis techniques in respiratory infections in primary care].

Authors:  Carles Llor; Miriam Alkorta Gurrutxaga; Josep de la Flor I Bru; Sílvia Bernárdez Carracedo; José Luis Cañada Merino; Mario Bárcena Caamaño; Carmen Serrano Martino; Josep Maria Cots Yago
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 1.137

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.