Literature DB >> 19181482

STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, MOOSE, PRISMA, GNOSIS, TREND, ORION, COREQ, QUOROM, REMARK... and CONSORT: for whom does the guideline toll?

Jan P Vandenbroucke1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19181482     DOI： 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN： 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


× No keyword cloud information.
  35 in total

1.  Reporting guidelines and the American Journal of Public Health's adoption of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Kenneth R McLeroy; Mary E Northridge; Hector Balcazar; Michael R Greenberg; Stewart J Landers
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies: the GRIPS statement.

Authors:  A Cecile Jw Janssens; John Pa Ioannidis; Cornelia M van Duijn; Julian Little; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 11.117

3.  Evaluation of reporting quality of the 2010 and 2012 National Surgical Congress oral presentations by CONSORT, STROBE and Timmer criteria.

Authors:  Mustafa Hasbahçeci; Fatih Başak; Ömer Uysal
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-09-01

4.  Analysis of reporting quality for oral presentations of observational studies at 19th National Surgical Congress: Proposal for a national evaluation system.

Authors:  Mustafa Hasbahçeci; Fatih Başak; Aylin Acar; Abdullah Şişik
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2016-12-01

Review 5.  Reporting quality of search methods in systematic reviews of HIV behavioral interventions (2000-2010): are the searches clearly explained, systematic and reproducible?

Authors:  Mary M Mullins; Julia B DeLuca; Nicole Crepaz; Cynthia M Lyles
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.273

Review 6.  Interpretation of correlations in clinical research.

Authors:  Man Hung; Jerry Bounsanga; Maren Wright Voss
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 7.  The reporting quality of studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of anti-CCP antibody in rheumatoid arthritis and its impact on diagnostic estimates.

Authors:  Elias Zintzaras; Afroditi A Papathanasiou; Dimitrios C Ziogas; Michael Voulgarelis
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Setting the RECORD straight: developing a guideline for the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected Data.

Authors:  Sinéad M Langan; Eric I Benchimol; Astrid Guttmann; David Moher; Irene Petersen; Liam Smeeth; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Fiona Stanley; Erik Von Elm
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  Evaluating the impact and use of Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomised Designs (TREND) reporting guidelines.

Authors:  Thomas Fuller; Mark Pearson; Jaime L Peters; Rob Anderson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Enhancing the reporting and transparency of rheumatology research: a guide to reporting guidelines.

Authors:  Robin Christensen; Henning Bliddal; Marius Henriksen
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 5.156
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.