Literature DB >> 19181468

Integrated contrast-enhanced diagnostic whole-body PET/CT as a first-line restaging modality in patients with suspected metastatic recurrence of breast cancer.

Albert Dirisamer1, Benjamin S Halpern, Daniel Flöry, Florian Wolf, Mohsen Beheshti, Marius E Mayerhoefer, Werner Langsteger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE(S): Only few information exist about the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT for restaging patients with metastatic recurrence of breast carcinoma. Therefore, our study hypothesis was to perform diagnostic contrast enhanced CT (ce-CT) and FDG-PET in a one-step investigation, to prove sensitivity of each modality and to determine whether diagnostic PET/CT adds information over PET or contrast enhanced CT alone for restaging of patients with suspected recurrence of breast cancer.
METHODS: Fifty-two patients with suspected recurrence of breast cancer were included in our study. All of them were free of metastasis after the first line therapy. Indications for restaging were: Elevated tumor markers n=32, clinical deterioration n=16 and/or suspicious findings on other imaging studies n=48. Integrated PET/CT was performed using contrast-enhanced diagnostic CT for attenuation correction.
RESULTS: PET was correct in 44/52 patients (85%), ce-CT in 38/52 patients (73%) and PET/CT in 50/52 patients (96%). Sensitivity and specificity of lesion detection of PET, CT and PET/CT were 84%, 66% and 93%, and 100%, 92%, and 100%, respectively. DISCUSSION: PET/CT can improve staging and alter therapeutic options in patients suspected to have breast cancer recurrence and distant metastatic disease, primarily by demonstrating local or distant nodal involvement occult at other imaging studies. The added value of FDG-PET/CT over other diagnostic modalities is mainly expressed by the fact that a noninvasive whole-body evaluation is possible in a single examination. Copyright (c) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19181468     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  13 in total

1.  The value of PET/CT to assess clinically negative necks.

Authors:  Enver Ozer; Barış Naiboğlu; Ryan Meacham; Cherie Ryoo; Amit Agrawal; David E Schuller
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Present and future role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yasuo Miyoshi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) compared to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging.

Authors:  Till-Alexander Heusner; Sherko Kuemmel; Angela Koeninger; Monia E Hamami; Steffen Hahn; Anton Quinsten; Andreas Bockisch; Michael Forsting; Thomas Lauenstein; Gerald Antoch; Alexander Stahl
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Disease Restaging and Diagnosis of Recurrent and Metastatic Disease Following Primary Therapy with FDG-PET Imaging.

Authors:  William B Eubank; Jean H Lee; David A Mankoff
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2009-07-01

5.  Early detection of metastatic disease in asymptomatic breast cancer patients with whole-body imaging and defined tumour marker increase.

Authors:  D Di Gioia; P Stieber; G P Schmidt; D Nagel; V Heinemann; A Baur-Melnyk
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Carcinoma en Cuirasse from Recurrent Breast Cancer seen on FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Aung Zaw Win; Carina Mari Aparici
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2015-06-29

Review 7.  Current approaches and challenges in early detection of breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Erika J Schneble; Lindsey J Graham; Matthew P Shupe; Frederick L Flynt; Kevin P Banks; Aaron D Kirkpatrick; Aviram Nissan; Leonard Henry; Alexander Stojadinovic; Nathan M Shumway; Itzhak Avital; George E Peoples; Robert F Setlik
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  The utility of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for suspected recurrent breast cancer: impact and prognostic stratification.

Authors:  Alexandre Cochet; Steven David; Kate Moodie; Elizabeth Drummond; Gaelle Dutu; Michael MacManus; Boon Chua; Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 9.  Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jose Luis Vercher-Conejero; Laura Pelegrí-Martinez; Diego Lopez-Aznar; María Del Puig Cózar-Santiago
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-16

Review 10.  The application of positron emission tomography (PET/CT) in diagnosis of breast cancer. Part II. Diagnosis after treatment initiation, future perspectives.

Authors:  Elżbieta Jodłowska; Rafał Czepczyński; Agata Czarnywojtek; Amanda Rewers; Grażyna Jarząbek; Witold Kędzia; Marek Ruchała
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2016-08-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.