Literature DB >> 19180891

Histologic and clinical response to varying density settings with a fractionally scanned carbon dioxide laser.

Raminder Saluja1, Jane Khoury, Susan P Detwiler, Mitchel P Goldman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An evaluation of the histological and clinical response to varying density settings (-10%, 0, and 10% overlap) with a fractionally scanned CO2 laser. STUDY
DESIGN: Clinical and histological study evaluating abdominoplasty excised tissue for depth of penetration and width of tissue ablated with varying density and energy settings utilizing a scanned microsecond pulsed CO2 laser. These parameters were correlated clinically with patients treated with similar density settings. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled with 5 patients in each group: group 1 (density 1 settings), group 2 (density 2 settings) and group 3 (density 3 settings). MAIN OUTCOME: Histological differences of width and depth of tissue ablated with varying density settings and correlation with photodamage improvement clinically.
METHODS: Six samples of excised abdominoplasty tissue were treated with increased energy and density settings and were evaluated histologically. Clinically, 15 patients with photodamage to the face were randomized to receive a fractional CO2 laser treatment with density levels ranging from 1 to 3.
RESULTS: Microarrays of tissue injury were visualized with multiple areas of superficial to full-thickness epidermal thermal damage. As energy increased (90 W to 100 W), the width of basophilic coagulation of the subepidermal collagen increased. Increased density paralleled increased depth of penetration of subepidermal coagulation. Patient assessment of discomfort, erythema, edema, and satisfaction with the procedure was proportional to increasing densities.
CONCLUSION: A fractional CO2 laser produces photorejuvenation, erythema, edema and discomfort in proportion with the depth and extent of epidermal and subepidermal thermal damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19180891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol        ISSN: 1545-9616            Impact factor:   2.114


  7 in total

1.  Random fractional ultrapulsed CO2 resurfacing of photodamaged facial skin: long-term evaluation.

Authors:  Matteo Tretti Clementoni; Michela Galimberti; Athanasia Tourlaki; Maximilian Catenacci; Rosalia Lavagno; Pier Luca Bencini
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  One laser for a cosmetic/dermatologic practice.

Authors:  Mitchel P Goldman
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2011-05

3.  Fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing.

Authors:  William M Ramsdell
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Histological evaluation of vertical laser channels from ablative fractional resurfacing: an ex vivo pig skin model.

Authors:  Christina Skovbølling Haak; Monica Illes; Uwe Paasch; Merete Hædersdal
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Low-fluence and low-density CO2 laser: histological analysis of collagen fiber changes in skin and its clinical repercussions in photorejuvenation.

Authors:  Juliana Merheb Jordão; Mariana Fajgenbaum Feiges Stoliar; Sarah Sanches Melo; Giovana Liz Marioto de Campos; Lismary Aparecida de Forville Mesquita; Thelma Larocca Skare
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Highlights of thirty-year experience of CO2 laser use at the Florence (Italy) department of dermatology.

Authors:  Piero Campolmi; Paolo Bonan; Giovanni Cannarozzo; Andrea Bassi; Nicola Bruscino; Meena Arunachalam; Michela Troiano; Torello Lotti; Silvia Moretti
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-19

7.  Histological validity and clinical evidence for use of fractional lasers for acne scars.

Authors:  Kabir Sardana; Vijay K Garg; Pooja Arora; Nita Khurana
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2012-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.