Literature DB >> 19180325

Bond strength of a pit-and-fissure sealant associated to etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesive systems to saliva-contaminated enamel: individual vs. simultaneous light curing.

Jaciara Miranda Gomes-Silva1, Carolina Paes Torres, Marta Maria Martins Giamatei Contente, Maria Angélica Hueb de Menezes Oliveira, Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb, Maria Cristina Borsatto.   

Abstract

This study evaluated in vitro the shear bond strength (SBS) of a resin-based pit-and-fissure sealant [Fluroshield (F), Dentsply/Caulk] associated with either an etch-and-rinse [Adper Single Bond 2 (SB), 3M/ESPE] or a self-etching adhesive system [Clearfil S3 Bond (S3), Kuraray Co., Ltd.] to saliva-contaminated enamel, comparing two curing protocols: individual light curing of the adhesive system and the sealant or simultaneous curing of both materials. Mesial and distal enamel surfaces from 45 sound third molars were randomly assigned to 6 groups (n=15), according to the bonding technique: I - F was applied to 37% phosphoric acid etched enamel. The other groups were contaminated with fresh human saliva (0.01 mL; 10 s) after acid etching: II - SB and F were light cured separately; III - SB and F were light cured together; IV - S3 and F were light cured separately; V - S3 and F were light cured simultaneously; VI - F was applied to saliva-contaminated, acid-etched enamel without an intermediate bonding agent layer. SBS was tested to failure in a universal testing machine at 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Fisher's test (alpha=0.05).The debonded specimens were examined with a stereomicroscope to assess the failure modes. Three representative specimens from each group were observed under scanning electron microscopy for a qualitative analysis. Mean SBS in MPa were: I-12.28 (+/-4.29); II-8.57 (+/-3.19); III-7.97 (+/-2.16); IV-12.56 (+/-3.11); V-11.45 (+/-3.77); and VI-7.47 (+/-1.99). In conclusion, individual or simultaneous curing of the intermediate bonding agent layer and the resin sealant did not seem to affect bond strength to saliva-contaminated enamel. S3/F presented significantly higher SBS than the that of the groups treated with SB etch-and-rinse adhesive system and similar SBS to that of the control group, in which the sealant was applied under ideal dry, noncontaminated conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19180325     DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402008000400010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  10 in total

1.  A Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Bonding Agent on the Tensile Bond Strength of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Invasive and Non-invasive Techniques: An in-vitro Study.

Authors:  Shamsher Singh; Vivek Adlakha; Prashant Babaji; Preetika Chandna; Abi M Thomas; Saroj Chopra
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-10-05

2.  Influence of self-etch all-in-one adhesives on fissure sealant shear bond strength under contaminated enamel conditions.

Authors:  A Coelho; J P Canta; J N R Martins; S Arantes-Oliveira; P F Marques
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2018-10-16

3.  Retention of fissure sealants using two different methods of application in teeth with hypomineralised molars (MIH): a 4 year clinical study.

Authors:  N A Lygidakis; G Dimou; E Stamataki
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2009-12

4.  Self-etch bonding agent beneath sealant: Bond strength for laser-irradiated enamel.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Borsatto; Jackelline de Lemes Giuntini; Marta Maria Martins Giamatei Contente; Jaciara Miranda Gomes-Silva; Carolina Paes Torres; Rodrigo Galo
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2013-07

5.  Microleakage of a Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite, a Self-Adhesive Fissure Sealant and a Conventional Fissure Sealant in Permanent Teeth with/without Saliva Contamination.

Authors:  Zohre Sadat Hosseinipour; Alireza Heidari; Mehdi Shahrabi; Kiana Poorzandpoush
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2019-08-30

6.  Assessment of shear bond strength and microleakage of fissure sealant following enamel deproteinization: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Gokcen-Deniz Bayrak; Elif-Beril Gurdogan-Guler; Yagmur Yildirim; Dilek Ozturk; Senem Selvi-Kuvvetli
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-03-01

7.  A 12-month clinical evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with and without etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in newly-erupted teeth.

Authors:  Maryam Karami Nogourani; Mohsen Janghorbani; Parvin Khadem; Zahra Jadidi; Shahriar Jalali
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 8.  Bonding agents in pit and fissure sealants: a review.

Authors:  Usha Mohan Das; Suma G
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2009-12-26

9.  Wear of two pit and fissure sealants in contact with primary teeth.

Authors:  Rodrigo Galo; Marta Maria Martins Giamatei Contente; Maria Cristina Borsatto
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-04

10.  Marginal Microleakage of Conventional Fissure Sealants and Self-Adhering Flowable Composite as Fissure Sealant in Permanent Teeth.

Authors:  Sara Rahimian-Imam; Nahid Ramazani; Mohammad Reza Fayazi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.