Literature DB >> 19180319

Computed tomography assessment of the efficiency of different techniques for removal of root canal filling material.

Cristina Dall'Agnol1, Mateus Silveira Martins Hartmann, Fernando Branco Barletta.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficiency of different techniques for removal of filling material from root canals, using computed tomography (CT). Sixty mesial roots from extracted human mandibular molars were used. Root canals were filled and, after 6 months, the teeth were randomly assigned to 3 groups, according to the root-filling removal technique: Group A - hand instrumentation with K-type files; Group B - reciprocating instrumentation with engine-driven K-type files; and Group C rotary instrumentation with engine-driven ProTaper system. CT scans were used to assess the volume of filling material inside the root canals before and after the removal procedure. In both moments, the area of filling material was outlined by an experienced radiologist and the volume of filling material was automatically calculated by the CT software program. Based on the volume of initial and residual filling material of each specimen, the percentage of filling material removed from the root canals by the different techniques was calculated. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and chi-square test for linear trend (?=0.05). No statistically significant difference (p=0.36) was found among the groups regarding the percent means of removed filling material. The analysis of the association between the percentage of filling material removal (high or low) and the proposed techniques by chi-square test showed statistically significant difference (p=0.015), as most cases in group B (reciprocating technique) presented less than 50% of filling material removed (low percent removal). In conclusion, none of the techniques evaluated in this study was effective in providing complete removal of filling material from the root canals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19180319     DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402008000400004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal.

Authors:  Mary Kinue Nakamune Uezu; Maria Leticia Borges Britto; Cleber K Nabeshima; Raul Capp Pallotta
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  CBCT Evaluation of the Root Canal Filling Removal Using D-RaCe, ProTaper Retreatment Kit and Hand Files in curved canals.

Authors:  Zahra Sadat Madani; Narges Simdar; Ehsan Moudi; Ali Bijani
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2014-12-24

3.  Efficacy of ProTaper and Mtwo Retreatment Files in Removal of Gutta-percha and GuttaFlow from Root Canals.

Authors:  Sedigheh Khedmat; Abbas Azari; Ahmad Reza Shamshiri; Mehdi Fadae; Hoorieh Bashizadeh Fakhar
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2016-05-01

4.  Evaluation of Root Canal Filling in Primary Teeth by Volumetric Analysis: In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Prachi Sijeria; Rahul Bhartia; Nanjunda Swamy Kv; Sadanand Kulkarni; Shilpy Singla
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2018-10-01

5.  An in vitro CT Comparison of Gutta-Percha Removal with Two Rotary Systems and Hedstrom Files.

Authors:  Pankaj Yadav; Makonahalli Jaganath Bharath; Chickmagravalli Krishnegowda Sahadev; Praveen Kumar Makonahalli Ramachandra; Yogesh Rao; Ambereen Ali; Shahnawaz Mohamed
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2013-05-01

6.  Regaining Apical Patency with Manual and Reciprocating Instrumentation during Retreatment.

Authors:  Rafaela Cristina Trierveiler Paiva; Caroline Solda; Felipe Vendramini; José Roberto Vanni; Flávia Baldissarelli Marcon; Volmir João Fornari; Mateus Silveira Martins Hartmann
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2018
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.