Literature DB >> 19179924

Radiographic assessment of lumbar facet distance spacing and pediatric spondylolysis.

Scott W Zehnder1, Carol V Ward, Austin J Crow, Dirk Alander, Bruce Latimer.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective radiographic review.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article was to explore the relationship between interfacet spacing and pediatric spondylolysis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recent literature suggests that a potential cause of spondylolytic defects in adults is a narrowed interfacet spacing in the lower lumbar spine. This lack of space places them at increased risk for pars fractures with repetitive lumbar hyperextension. This relationship has not been explored in a pediatric population.
METHODS: The anteroposterior lumbar spine radiographs of 41 pediatric patients with spondylolytic defects were compared with 41 unaffected controls. A standard digital caliper was used to measure interfacet distance. Vertebral body width and interpedicular distance were recorded as internal standards to control for varying vertebral size. Statistical analysis exploring the relationships of interfacet distances between the affected and unaffected groups was performed using a Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: The absolute increase in interfacet distance between adjacent levels was significantly smaller at the L4/L5 level in spondylolytic individuals (P = 0.023). When interpedicular distance was used to standardize for vertebral body size, a significantly smaller increase in the interpedicular distance was noted at the L4/5 level in spondylolytic individuals (P = 0.026). Similar results were obtained when body width was used to standardize for vertebral body size (P < 0.001). A similar trend was noticed at the L3/4 level when standardizing with interpedicular distance although these results were not significant (P = 0.098).
CONCLUSION: A likely explanation for the etiology of lumbar pars defects is insufficient caudal increase in lumbar interfacet spacing. Further prospective studies are necessary to determine if unaffected individuals with a narrowed interfacet spacing are at increased risk of developing spondylolytic defects later in life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19179924     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181956053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

Review 1.  L5 spondylolysis/spondylolisthesis: a comprehensive review with an anatomic focus.

Authors:  Paul Foreman; Christoph J Griessenauer; Koichi Watanabe; Michael Conklin; Mohammadali M Shoja; Curtis J Rozzelle; Marios Loukas; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Lumbar spondylolysis: a review.

Authors:  Antonio Leone; Alessandro Cianfoni; Alfonso Cerase; Nicola Magarelli; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Spondylolysis.

Authors:  Nathan Li; Sam Amarasinghe; Kyle Boudreaux; Waddih Fakhre; William Sherman; Alan Kaye
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-08-30

4.  Predictors of Spondylolysis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Adolescent Athletes With Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Takuji Yokoe; Takuya Tajima; Hiroshi Sugimura; Shinichirou Kubo; Shotarou Nozaki; Nami Yamaguchi; Yudai Morita; Etsuo Chosa
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-09

5.  Does facet joint morphology affect the development of spondylolysis?

Authors:  Hayato Ishitani
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2020-12-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.