BACKGROUND: There is currently no standard treatment for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) whose disease progresses after docetaxel-based chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the anticancer activity and tolerance of the carboplatin-etoposide combination in this setting while evaluating neuroendocrine (NE) features. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with CRPC and metastases who experienced failure after first-line docetaxel-based chemotherapy were treated with carboplatin (area under the curve 5, day 1) and etoposide (80 mg/m(2)/day from days 1 to 3), repeated every 3 weeks. The association between serum chromogranin A (CgA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), prostate-specific antigen-doubling time (PSADT), and treatment efficacy was studied. RESULTS: Forty patients with CRPC who had received docetaxel with (n = 20) or without (n = 20) estramustine received the carboplatin-etoposide combination as second-line chemotherapy. A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response defined as a PSA decline > or =50% was achieved in nine patients (23%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.1 months (range 0.6-9.6) and median overall survival was 19 months (range 2.1-27.7). Pain response was achieved in 15 (53%) of 28 assessable patients. Toxicity, including mainly grades 3-4 anaemia (25%) and febrile neutropenia in only 2% of patients, was manageable. Baseline CgA, NSE, or PSADT were not significant predictors for response or PFS. The PSA response rates were 18% and 31% in patients with normal and elevated serum CgA, respectively. It was 25% and 20%, respectively, in patients with normal and elevated serum NSE. CONCLUSIONS: Combining carboplatin and etoposide as second-line chemotherapy in patients with CRPC is active and well tolerated in spite of a limited PFS. Activity was observed in CRPC with and without NE features.
BACKGROUND: There is currently no standard treatment for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) whose disease progresses after docetaxel-based chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the anticancer activity and tolerance of the carboplatin-etoposide combination in this setting while evaluating neuroendocrine (NE) features. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with CRPC and metastases who experienced failure after first-line docetaxel-based chemotherapy were treated with carboplatin (area under the curve 5, day 1) and etoposide (80 mg/m(2)/day from days 1 to 3), repeated every 3 weeks. The association between serum chromogranin A (CgA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), prostate-specific antigen-doubling time (PSADT), and treatment efficacy was studied. RESULTS: Forty patients with CRPC who had received docetaxel with (n = 20) or without (n = 20) estramustine received the carboplatin-etoposide combination as second-line chemotherapy. A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response defined as a PSA decline > or =50% was achieved in nine patients (23%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.1 months (range 0.6-9.6) and median overall survival was 19 months (range 2.1-27.7). Pain response was achieved in 15 (53%) of 28 assessable patients. Toxicity, including mainly grades 3-4 anaemia (25%) and febrile neutropenia in only 2% of patients, was manageable. Baseline CgA, NSE, or PSADT were not significant predictors for response or PFS. The PSA response rates were 18% and 31% in patients with normal and elevated serum CgA, respectively. It was 25% and 20%, respectively, in patients with normal and elevated serum NSE. CONCLUSIONS: Combining carboplatin and etoposide as second-line chemotherapy in patients with CRPC is active and well tolerated in spite of a limited PFS. Activity was observed in CRPC with and without NE features.
Authors: Christoph W M Reuter; Michael A Morgan; Philipp Ivanyi; Martin Fenner; Arnold Ganser; Viktor Grünwald Journal: World J Urol Date: 2010-03-14 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: B Walter; S Rogenhofer; M Vogelhuber; A Berand; W F Wieland; R Andreesen; A Reichle Journal: World J Urol Date: 2010-05-19 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Jianqing Lin; Sheel A Patel; Ashwin R Sama; Jean H Hoffman-Censits; Brooke Kennedy; Deborah Kilpatrick; Zhong Ye; Hushan Yang; Zhaomei Mu; Benjamin Leiby; Nancy Lewis; Massimo Cristofanilli; William Kevin Kelly Journal: Oncologist Date: 2016-10-24
Authors: Ana M Aparicio; Li Shen; Elsa Li Ning Tapia; Jing-Fang Lu; Hsiang-Chun Chen; Jiexin Zhang; Guanglin Wu; Xuemei Wang; Patricia Troncoso; Paul Corn; Timothy C Thompson; Bradley Broom; Keith Baggerly; Sankar N Maity; Christopher J Logothetis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Rosa Nadal; Michael Schweizer; Oleksandr N Kryvenko; Jonathan I Epstein; Mario A Eisenberger Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Ana M Aparicio; Andrea L Harzstark; Paul G Corn; Sijin Wen; John C Araujo; Shi-Ming Tu; Lance C Pagliaro; Jeri Kim; Randall E Millikan; Charles Ryan; Nizar M Tannir; Amado J Zurita; Paul Mathew; Wadih Arap; Patricia Troncoso; Peter F Thall; Christopher J Logothetis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Vincenza Conteduca; Clara Oromendia; Kenneth W Eng; Rohan Bareja; Michael Sigouros; Ana Molina; Bishoy M Faltas; Andrea Sboner; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Olivier Elemento; David M Nanus; Scott T Tagawa; Karla V Ballman; Himisha Beltran Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 9.162