Literature DB >> 19179017

[Oocyte and embryo quality and outcome of ICSI cycles in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) versus normo-ovulatory].

M Kdous1, A Chaker, A Zhioua, F Zhioua.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the oocyte and embryo quality and outcomes in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients and normo-ovulatory women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied retrospectively 100 controlled ovarian stimulation cycles for ICSI in women with PCOS and 200 cycles in normo-ovulatory women. Every PCOS woman was paired according to age with two normo-ovulatory woman undergoing ICSI during the same study period. A long protocol of gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GNRH) agonist was carried out in all patients. The main outcome measures evaluated were: cancellation of the cycles, number of aspirated follicles, oocyte maturity, fertilization rate, embryo quality pregnancy and implantation rates, clinical abortion rate, multiple pregnancy rate and the "take-home baby" rate. Khi(2) test and Student t test were used for differences between normo-ovulatory and PCOS patients and the limit of significance was set at p<0,05.
RESULTS: ICSI was performed for male infertility in most cases (79% in PCOS group vs 79,5%; NS). There was no significant difference in term of cancellation rate (5,5% in PCOS group vs 5%; NS). The mean number of follicles was higher in patients with PCOS (18,1+/-8,5 vs 9,4+/-5,5; p<0,001). Oocyte mature rate (67% vs 52%; p<0,001), fertilization rate (75% vs 63,7%; p<0,001) and grade 1 embryo rate (69% vs 53%; p<0,001) were significantly higher in PCOS group. The mean number of transferred embryos was similar in the two groups (2,46+/-0,5 vs 2,54+/-1,01; NS). Implantation rate (16,6% vs 12,1%; NS), clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (31,5% vs 24%; NS) and Live birth rate (22% vs 20%; NS) did not differ statistically in the two groups. Twin and triplet pregnancies rates were similar in the two groups (20% vs 16,7%; NS and 6,6% vs 7,1% ; NS respectively). Miscarriage rate was higher in PCOS group but this did not reach the statistical significance (26,6% vs 16,6%; NS).
CONCLUSION: PCOS patients showed better global oocyte and embryo quality. However, pregnancy and live birth rates were similar in the two groups when number and quality of transferred embryos are equivalent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19179017     DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2008.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)        ISSN: 0150-9918


  5 in total

1.  Follicular fluid lipid fingerprinting from women with PCOS and hyper response during IVF treatment.

Authors:  Fernanda Bertuccez Cordeiro; Thaís Regiani Cataldi; Lívia do Vale Teixeira da Costa; Camila Bruna de Lima; Juliana Stevanato; Daniel Suslik Zylbersztejn; Christina Ramires Ferreira; Marcos Nogueira Eberlin; Agnaldo Pereira Cedenho; Edson Guimarães Lo Turco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  The Pathogenesis of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): The Hypothesis of PCOS as Functional Ovarian Hyperandrogenism Revisited.

Authors:  Robert L Rosenfield; David A Ehrmann
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 19.871

3.  The impact of follicular fluid adiponectin and ghrelin levels based on BMI on IVF outcomes in PCOS.

Authors:  H A Inal; N Yilmaz; U Gorkem; A S Oruc; H Timur
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Polycystic ovary syndrome phenotype does not have impact on oocyte morphology.

Authors:  Audrey Uk; Christine Decanter; Camille Grysole; Laura Keller; Hélène Béhal; Mauro Silva; Didier Dewailly; Geoffroy Robin; Anne-Laure Barbotin
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  Treatment of infertility in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: approach to clinical practice.

Authors:  Anderson Sanches Melo; Rui Alberto Ferriani; Paula Andrea Navarro
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.365

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.