OBJECTIVE: To develop and explore the characteristics of a novel "nearest neighbor" methodology for creating peer groups for health care facilities. DATA SOURCES: Data were obtained from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) databases. STATISTICAL METHODS AND FINDINGS: Peer groups are developed by first calculating the multidimensional Euclidean distance between each of 133 VA medical centers based on 16 facility characteristics. Each medical center then serves as the center for its own peer group, and the nearest neighbor facilities in terms of Euclidean distance comprise the peer facilities. We explore the attributes and characteristics of the nearest neighbor peer groupings. In addition, we construct standard cluster analysis-derived peer groups and compare the characteristics of groupings from the two methodologies. CONCLUSIONS: The novel peer group methodology presented here results in groups where each medical center is at the center of its own peer group. Possible advantages over other peer group methodologies are that facilities are never on the "edge" of a group and group size-and thus group dispersion-is determined by the researcher. Peer groups with these characteristics may be more appealing to some researchers and administrators than standard cluster analysis and may thus strengthen organizational buy-in for financial and quality comparisons.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and explore the characteristics of a novel "nearest neighbor" methodology for creating peer groups for health care facilities. DATA SOURCES: Data were obtained from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) databases. STATISTICAL METHODS AND FINDINGS: Peer groups are developed by first calculating the multidimensional Euclidean distance between each of 133 VA medical centers based on 16 facility characteristics. Each medical center then serves as the center for its own peer group, and the nearest neighbor facilities in terms of Euclidean distance comprise the peer facilities. We explore the attributes and characteristics of the nearest neighbor peer groupings. In addition, we construct standard cluster analysis-derived peer groups and compare the characteristics of groupings from the two methodologies. CONCLUSIONS: The novel peer group methodology presented here results in groups where each medical center is at the center of its own peer group. Possible advantages over other peer group methodologies are that facilities are never on the "edge" of a group and group size-and thus group dispersion-is determined by the researcher. Peer groups with these characteristics may be more appealing to some researchers and administrators than standard cluster analysis and may thus strengthen organizational buy-in for financial and quality comparisons.
Authors: Oliver Groene; Niek Klazinga; Vahé Kazandjian; Pierre Lombrail; Paul Bartels Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2008-03-30 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Mary Ersek; Anne Sales; Shimrit Keddem; Roman Ayele; Leah M Haverhals; Kate H Magid; Jennifer Kononowech; Andrew Murray; Joan G Carpenter; Mary Beth Foglia; Lucinda Potter; Jennifer McKenzie; Darlene Davis; Cari Levy Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2022-07-20
Authors: Joan G Carpenter; Winifred Josephine Scott; Jennifer Kononowech; Mary Beth Foglia; Leah M Haverhals; Robert Hogikyan; Ann Kolanowski; Zach Landis-Lewis; Cari Levy; Susan C Miller; V J Periyakoil; Ciaran S Phibbs; Lucinda Potter; Anne Sales; Mary Ersek Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 3.734
Authors: Jessica A Davila; Jennifer R Kramer; Zhigang Duan; Peter A Richardson; Gia L Tyson; Yvonne H Sada; Fasiha Kanwal; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: Hepatology Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Jeffrey H Silber; Paul R Rosenbaum; Richard N Ross; Justin M Ludwig; Wei Wang; Bijan A Niknam; Philip A Saynisch; Orit Even-Shoshan; Rachel R Kelz; Lee A Fleisher Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2014-09-08 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Laura A Petersen; Kate Simpson; Richard Sorelle; Tracy Urech; Supicha Sookanan Chitwood Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-05-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Shailaja Menon; Michael W Smith; Dean F Sittig; Nancy J Petersen; Sylvia J Hysong; Donna Espadas; Varsha Modi; Hardeep Singh Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-11-11 Impact factor: 2.692