Literature DB >> 19178564

Seizure metaphors differ in patients' accounts of epileptic and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.

Leendert Plug1, Basil Sharrack, Markus Reuber.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To increase understanding of the subjective symptomatology of seizure experiences and improve differential diagnosis by studying the seizure metaphors used by patients with (psychogenic) nonepileptic seizures (NES) and epilepsy.
METHODS: Twenty-one unselected patients taking part in this study were admitted for 48 h of video-EEG (electroenceophalography) observation because of uncertainty about the diagnosis. Eight were proven to have epilepsy, 13 to have psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). During their admission, patients were interviewed by a neurologist. A linguist blinded to the medical diagnosis identified and categorized all seizure metaphors in verbatim transcripts. Between-group comparisons and logistic regression analysis were carried out.
RESULTS: Of 382 metaphors identified, 80.8% conceptualized seizures as an agent/force, event/situation, or space/place. Most patients used metaphors from all categories, but patients with epilepsy and PNES showed preferences for different metaphoric concepts (differences p = 0.009 to p = 0.039). Patients with epilepsy preferred metaphors depicting the seizure as an agent/force or event/situation. PNES patients more often used metaphors of space/place. Logistic regression analyses predicted the diagnosis of PNES or epilepsy correctly in 85.7% of cases (based on different metaphor types in the each category) or 81.0% (based on all metaphor tokens). DISCUSSION: Patients with epilepsy and PNES have different preferences in the metaphoric conceptualization of their seizures. Epileptic seizures are described as a more external, self-directed entity than PNES, which are depicted as a state or place patients go through. The differentiating value of metaphoric conceptualizations suggests that metaphor preference could form the basis of future diagnostic questionnaires or other diagnostic tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19178564     DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01798.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  5 in total

Review 1.  Epilepsy, cognition, and neuropsychiatry (Epilepsy, Brain, and Mind, part 2).

Authors:  Amos D Korczyn; Steven C Schachter; Martin J Brodie; Sarang S Dalal; Jerome Engel; Alla Guekht; Hrvoje Hecimovic; Karim Jerbi; Andres M Kanner; Cecilie Johannessen Landmark; Pavel Mares; Petr Marusic; Stefano Meletti; Marco Mula; Philip N Patsalos; Markus Reuber; Philippe Ryvlin; Klára Štillová; Roberto Tuchman; Ivan Rektor
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 2.937

2.  Value of patient-reported symptoms in the diagnosis of transient loss of consciousness.

Authors:  Markus Reuber; Min Chen; Jenny Jamnadas-Khoda; Mark Broadhurst; Melanie Wall; Richard A Grünewald; Stephen J Howell; Matthias Koepp; Steve Parry; Sanjay Sisodiya; Matthew Walker; Dale Hesdorffer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Personality traits in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) and psychogenic movement disorder (PMD): Neuroticism and perfectionism.

Authors:  Vindhya Ekanayake; Sarah Kranick; Kathrin LaFaver; Arshi Naz; Anne Frank Webb; W Curt LaFrance; Mark Hallett; Valerie Voon
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  People with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: A South African perspective.

Authors:  Chrisma Pretorius; Gretha Cronje
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2015-07-10

5.  Perceptions in PNES: A Bidirectional Problem.

Authors:  Barbara Dworetzky
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 7.500

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.