Literature DB >> 19177522

Variation in age and physical status prior to total knee and hip replacement surgery: a comparison of centers in Australia and Europe.

Ilana N Ackerman1, Paul A Dieppe, Lyn M March, Ewa M Roos, Anna K Nilsdotter, Graeme C Brown, Karen E Sloan, Richard H Osborne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether variation exists in the preoperative age, pain, stiffness, and physical function of people undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR) at several centers in Australia and Europe.
METHODS: Individual Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index data (range 0-100, where 0 = best and 100 = worst) collected within 6 weeks prior to primary TKR and THR were extracted from 16 centers (n = 2,835) according to specified eligibility criteria. Analysis of covariance was used to evaluate differences in pain, stiffness, and physical function between centers, with adjustment for age and sex.
RESULTS: There was marked variation in the age of people undergoing surgery between the centers (TKR mean age 67-73 years; F[6,1004] = 4.21, P < 0.01, and THR mean age 63-72 years; F[14,1807] = 7.27, P < 0.01). Large differences in preoperative status were observed between centers, most notably for pain (TKR adjusted mean pain 52.5-61.1; F[6,1002] = 4.26, P < 0.01, and THR adjusted mean pain 49.2-65.7; F[14,1802] = 8.44, P < 0.01) and physical function (TKR adjusted mean function 52.7-61.4; F[6,1002] = 5.27, P < 0.01, and THR adjusted mean function 53.3-71.0; F[14,1802] = 6.71, P < 0.01). Large effect sizes (up to 0.98) reflect the magnitude of variation between centers and highlight the clinical relevance of these findings.
CONCLUSION: The large variations in age and preoperative status indicate substantial differences in the timing of joint replacement across the centers studied, with potential for compromised surgical outcomes due to premature or delayed surgery. Possible contributing factors include patient preferences, the absence of concrete indications for surgery, and the capacity of the health care systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19177522     DOI: 10.1002/art.24215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  23 in total

1.  The role of pain and functional impairment in the decision to recommend total joint replacement in hip and knee osteoarthritis: an international cross-sectional study of 1909 patients. Report of the OARSI-OMERACT Task Force on total joint replacement.

Authors:  L Gossec; S Paternotte; J F Maillefert; C Combescure; P G Conaghan; A M Davis; K-P Gunther; G Hawker; M Hochberg; J N Katz; M Kloppenburg; K Lim; L S Lohmander; N N Mahomed; L March; K Pavelka; L Punzi; E M Roos; L Sanchez-Riera; J A Singh; M E Suarez-Almazor; M Dougados
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Preoperative pain and function profiles reflect consistent TKA patient selection among US surgeons.

Authors:  David C Ayers; Wenjun Li; Leslie Harrold; Jeroan Allison; Patricia D Franklin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Disability for daily living is a predictor for joint replacement in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Lizu Liu; Muneaki Ishijima; Haruka Kaneko; Ippei Futami; Ryo Sadatsuki; Shinnosuke Hada; Anwarjan Yusup; Yukio Shimura; Mitsuaki Kubota; Yoshitomo Saita; Yuji Takazawa; Hiroshi Ikeda; Hisashi Kurosawa; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Strategies Aimed at Preventing Chronic Post-surgical Pain: Comprehensive Perioperative Pain Management after Total Joint Replacement Surgery.

Authors:  Hance Clarke; Linda J Woodhouse; Deborah Kennedy; Paul Stratford; Joel Katz
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  Summary and recommendations of the OARSI FDA osteoarthritis Assessment of Structural Change Working Group.

Authors:  P G Conaghan; D J Hunter; J F Maillefert; W M Reichmann; E Losina
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Patient relevant outcome 7 years after total hip replacement for OA - a prospective study.

Authors:  Anna-K Nilsdotter; Fredrik Isaksson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  European Project on OSteoArthritis (EPOSA): methodological challenges in harmonization of existing data from five European population-based cohorts on aging.

Authors:  Laura A Schaap; Geeske Mee Peeters; Elaine M Dennison; Sabina Zambon; Thorsten Nikolaus; Mercedes Sanchez-Martinez; Estella Musacchio; Natasja M van Schoor; Dorly Jh Deeg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Incidence of acute kidney injury following total joint arthroplasty: a retrospective review by RIFLE criteria.

Authors:  Lara A Kimmel; Scott Wilson; Jyotsna D Janardan; Susan M Liew; Rowan G Walker
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2014-10-28

9.  Patient-reported outcomes after hip and knee arthroplasty : results from a large national registry.

Authors:  Emma Louise Heath; Ilana N Ackerman; Kara Cashman; Michelle Lorimer; Stephen E Graves; Ian A Harris
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-06

10.  Health-related quality of life after conservatively and surgically-treated paediatric proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Thoralf R Liebs; Ingmar Rompen; Steffen M Berger; Kai Ziebarth
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.