Literature DB >> 1917716

Cochlear efferent neurones and protection against acoustic trauma: protection of outer hair cell receptor current and interanimal variability.

R B Patuzzi1, M L Thompson.   

Abstract

We have measured the changes in neural and microphonic sensitivity in the basal turn of the guinea-pig cochlea produced by intense acoustic overstimulation (10 kHz, 115 dB SPL for 60 s and 150 s). As reported previously, the drop in neural and microphonic sensitivities observed after overstimulation were highly correlated [Patuzzi et al. (1989) Hear. Res. 39, 189-202]. Presentation of a non-traumatizing pure-tone to the contralateral ear (10 kHz, 80 dB SPL) during acoustic overstimulation reduced the amount of acoustic trauma measured using the neural response or the microphonic response. Transection of the medial olivo-cochlear system of efferent fibres at the floor of the fourth ventricle abolished this protective effect of contralateral sound and dramatically reduced the variability in the data. Since the low-frequency microphonic is a simple measure of the receptor current through the outer hair cells, and this current probably plays a part in enhancing the mechanical sensitivity of the cochlea, the protection of the microphonic we have observed suggests that the efferent system protects neural sensitivity by protecting the mechano-electrical transduction of outer hair cells. The drop in variability after sectioning the efferents also suggests that inter-animal variations in susceptibility to noise trauma may be a consequence of differing tonic activity of the efferents, and/or a variation in the sensitivity of the efferent pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1917716     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(91)90135-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  7 in total

1.  Variation in inter-animal susceptibility to noise damage is associated with alpha 9 acetylcholine receptor subunit expression level.

Authors:  Anne E Luebke; Paul K Foster
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Protection from acoustic trauma is not a primary function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system.

Authors:  E Christopher Kirk; David W Smith
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06-06

3.  The efferent-mediated suppression of otoacoustic emissions in awake guinea pigs and its reversible blockage by gentamicin.

Authors:  P Avan; J P Erre; D L da Costa; J M Aran; J Popelár
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions predicts susceptibility to acoustic over-exposure in alert rabbits.

Authors:  Anne E Luebke; Barden B Stagner; Glen K Martin; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Diverse responses of single auditory afferent fibres to electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus in guinea-pig.

Authors:  W H A M Mulders; D Robertson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  The olivocochlear system and protection from acoustic trauma: a mini literature review.

Authors:  Adrian Fuente
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-22

7.  The correlation between hair and eye colour and contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Marike Klopper; Leigh Biagio-de Jager; Bart Vinck
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.867

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.