Literature DB >> 19177029

Validation of VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes on interindividual warfarin maintenance dose: a prospective study in Chinese patients.

Sheng-Wen Huang1, Hai-Sheng Chen, Xian-Qun Wang, Ling Huang, Ding-Li Xu, Xiao-Jia Hu, Zhi-Hui Huang, Yong He, Kai-Ming Chen, Dao-Kang Xiang, Xiao-Ming Zou, Qiang Li, Li-Qin Ma, Hao-Fei Wang, Bao-Lin Chen, Liang Li, Yan-Kai Jia, Xiang-Min Xu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a warfarin-dosing algorithm that could be combined with pharmacogenomic and demographic factors, and to evaluate its effectiveness in a randomized prospective controlled clinical trial.
METHODS: A pharmacogenetics-based dosing model was derived using retrospective data from 266 Chinese patients and multiple linear regression analysis. To prospectively validate this model, 156 patients with an operation of heart valve replacement were enrolled and randomly assigned to the group of pharmacogenetics-guided or traditional dosing for warfarin therapy. All patients were followed up for 50 days after initiation of warfarin therapy. The log-rank test was compared with the time-to-event (Kaplan-Meier) curves. Cox proportional hazards-regression model was used to assess the hazard ratio of the time to reach stable dose.
RESULTS: The linear regression model derived from the pharmacogenomic model correlated with 54.1% of warfarin dosing variance. The final multiple linear regression model included age, body surface area, VKORC1, and CYP2C9 genotype. The study showed that the hazard ratio for the time to reach stable dose was 1.932 for the traditional dosing group versus the model-based group and a close and highly significant relationship was observed to exist between the predicted and the actual warfarin dose (R=0.454).
CONCLUSION: A pharmacogenetics-based dosing algorithm has been developed for improvement in the time to reach the stable dosing of warfarin. This model may be useful in helping the clinicians to prescribe warfarin with greater safety and efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19177029     DOI: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e328326e0c7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics        ISSN: 1744-6872            Impact factor:   2.089


  57 in total

1.  Warfarin dose requirement in patients having severe thrombosis or thrombophilia.

Authors:  Tuukka A Helin; Lotta Joutsi-Korhonen; Heidi Asmundela; Mikko Niemi; Arto Orpana; Riitta Lassila
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Anne Holbrook; Sam Schulman; Daniel M Witt; Per Olav Vandvik; Jason Fish; Michael J Kovacs; Peter J Svensson; David L Veenstra; Mark Crowther; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  The future of warfarin pharmacogenetics in under-represented minority groups.

Authors:  Larisa H Cavallari; Minoli A Perera
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2012-07

4.  Statistical Optimization of Pharmacogenomics Association Studies: Key Considerations from Study Design to Analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin J Grady; Marylyn D Ritchie
Journal:  Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med       Date:  2011-03-01

5.  Limited clinical utility of genotype-guided warfarin initiation dosing algorithms versus standard therapy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  H L Tang; W L Shi; X G Li; T Zhang; S D Zhai; H G Xie
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.550

6.  Development of a novel individualized warfarin dose algorithm based on a population pharmacokinetic model with improved prediction accuracy for Chinese patients after heart valve replacement.

Authors:  Yu-Bin Zhu; Xian-Hua Hong; Meng Wei; Jing Hu; Xin Chen; Shu-Kui Wang; Jun-Rong Zhu; Feng Yu; Jian-Guo Sun
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Genotype-Guided vs Standard Dosing of Warfarin.

Authors:  Khagendra Dahal; Sharan P Sharma; Erik Fung; Juyong Lee; Jason H Moore; John N Unterborn; Scott M Williams
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Are Evidence Standards Different for Genomic- vs. Clinical-Based Precision Medicine? A Quantitative Analysis of Individualized Warfarin Therapy.

Authors:  D S Dhanda; G F Guzauskas; J J Carlson; A Basu; D L Veenstra
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 9.  Personalized genomes and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Kiran Musunuru
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.915

10.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reveals an improved clinical outcome of using genotype plus clinical algorithm for warfarin dosing.

Authors:  Zhenqi Liao; Shaoguang Feng; Peng Ling; Guoqing Zhang
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.