MOTIVATION: DNA copy number aberration--both inherited and sporadic--is a significant contributor to a variety of human diseases. Copy number characterization is therefore an area of intense research. Probe hybridization-based arrays are important tools used to measure copy number in a high-throughput manner. RESULTS: In this article, we present a simple but powerful nonparametric rank-based approach to detect deletions and gains from raw array copy number measurements. We use three different rank-based statistics to detect three separate molecular phenomena-somatic lesions, germline deletions and germline gains. The approach is robust and rigorously grounded in statistical theory, thereby enabling the meaningful assignment of statistical significance to each putative aberration. We demonstrate the flexibility of our approach by applying it to data from three different array platforms. We show that our method compares favorably with established approaches by applying it to published well-characterized samples. Power simulations demonstrate exquisite sensitivity for array data of reasonable quality. CONCLUSIONS: Our flexible rank-based framework is suitable for multiple platforms including single nucleotide polymorphism arrays and array comparative genomic hybridization, and can reliably detect gains or losses of genomic DNA, whether inherited, de novo, or somatic. AVAILABILITY: An R package RankCopy containing the methods described here, and is freely available from the author's web site (http://mendel.gene.cwru.edu/laframboiselab/). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: DNA copy number aberration--both inherited and sporadic--is a significant contributor to a variety of human diseases. Copy number characterization is therefore an area of intense research. Probe hybridization-based arrays are important tools used to measure copy number in a high-throughput manner. RESULTS: In this article, we present a simple but powerful nonparametric rank-based approach to detect deletions and gains from raw array copy number measurements. We use three different rank-based statistics to detect three separate molecular phenomena-somatic lesions, germline deletions and germline gains. The approach is robust and rigorously grounded in statistical theory, thereby enabling the meaningful assignment of statistical significance to each putative aberration. We demonstrate the flexibility of our approach by applying it to data from three different array platforms. We show that our method compares favorably with established approaches by applying it to published well-characterized samples. Power simulations demonstrate exquisite sensitivity for array data of reasonable quality. CONCLUSIONS: Our flexible rank-based framework is suitable for multiple platforms including single nucleotide polymorphism arrays and array comparative genomic hybridization, and can reliably detect gains or losses of genomic DNA, whether inherited, de novo, or somatic. AVAILABILITY: An R package RankCopy containing the methods described here, and is freely available from the author's web site (http://mendel.gene.cwru.edu/laframboiselab/). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: George H Perry; Amir Ben-Dor; Anya Tsalenko; Nick Sampas; Laia Rodriguez-Revenga; Charles W Tran; Alicia Scheffer; Israel Steinfeld; Peter Tsang; N Alice Yamada; Han Soo Park; Jong-Il Kim; Jeong-Sun Seo; Zohar Yakhini; Stephen Laderman; Laurakay Bruhn; Charles Lee Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2008-01-24 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Iuliana Ionita-Laza; George H Perry; Benjamin A Raby; Barbara Klanderman; Charles Lee; Nan M Laird; Scott T Weiss; Christoph Lange Journal: Genet Epidemiol Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: Kai Wang; Mingyao Li; Dexter Hadley; Rui Liu; Joseph Glessner; Struan F A Grant; Hakon Hakonarson; Maja Bucan Journal: Genome Res Date: 2007-10-05 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Joshua M Korn; Finny G Kuruvilla; Steven A McCarroll; Alec Wysoker; James Nemesh; Simon Cawley; Earl Hubbell; Jim Veitch; Patrick J Collins; Katayoon Darvishi; Charles Lee; Marcia M Nizzari; Stacey B Gabriel; Shaun Purcell; Mark J Daly; David Altshuler Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2008-09-07 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Lauren A Weiss; Yiping Shen; Joshua M Korn; Dan E Arking; David T Miller; Ragnheidur Fossdal; Evald Saemundsen; Hreinn Stefansson; Manuel A R Ferreira; Todd Green; Orah S Platt; Douglas M Ruderfer; Christopher A Walsh; David Altshuler; Aravinda Chakravarti; Rudolph E Tanzi; Kari Stefansson; Susan L Santangelo; James F Gusella; Pamela Sklar; Bai-Lin Wu; Mark J Daly Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-01-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Edward J Hollox; Ulrike Huffmeier; Patrick L J M Zeeuwen; Raquel Palla; Jesús Lascorz; Diana Rodijk-Olthuis; Peter C M van de Kerkhof; Heiko Traupe; Gys de Jongh; Martin den Heijer; André Reis; John A L Armour; Joost Schalkwijk Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2007-12-02 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Samuel Levy; Granger Sutton; Pauline C Ng; Lars Feuk; Aaron L Halpern; Brian P Walenz; Nelson Axelrod; Jiaqi Huang; Ewen F Kirkness; Gennady Denisov; Yuan Lin; Jeffrey R MacDonald; Andy Wing Chun Pang; Mary Shago; Timothy B Stockwell; Alexia Tsiamouri; Vineet Bafna; Vikas Bansal; Saul A Kravitz; Dana A Busam; Karen Y Beeson; Tina C McIntosh; Karin A Remington; Josep F Abril; John Gill; Jon Borman; Yu-Hui Rogers; Marvin E Frazier; Stephen W Scherer; Robert L Strausberg; J Craig Venter Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Jacob Almagro-Garcia; Magnus Manske; Celine Carret; Susana Campino; Sarah Auburn; Bronwyn L Macinnis; Gareth Maslen; Arnab Pain; Christopher I Newbold; Dominic P Kwiatkowski; Taane G Clark Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2009-08-16 Impact factor: 6.937