Literature DB >> 19175141

Evaluation of a commercial biologically based IMRT treatment planning system.

Vladimir A Semenenko1, Bodo Reitz, Ellen Day, X Sharon Qi, Moyed Miften, X Allen Li.   

Abstract

A new inverse treatment planning system (TPS) for external beam radiation therapy with high energy photons is commercially available that utilizes both dose-volume-based cost functions and a selection of cost functions which are based on biological models. The purpose of this work is to evaluate quality of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans resulting from the use of biological cost functions in comparison to plans designed using a traditional TPS employing dose-volume-based optimization. Treatment planning was performed independently at two institutions. For six cancer patients, including head and neck (one case from each institution), prostate, brain, liver, and rectal cases, segmental multileaf collimator IMRT plans were designed using biological cost functions and compared with clinically used dose-based plans for the same patients. Dose-volume histograms and dosimetric indices, such as minimum, maximum, and mean dose, were extracted and compared between the two types of treatment plans. Comparisons of the generalized equivalent uniform dose (EUD), a previously proposed plan quality index (fEUD), target conformity and heterogeneity indices, and the number of segments and monitor units were also performed. The most prominent feature of the biologically based plans was better sparing of organs at risk (OARs). When all plans from both institutions were combined, the biologically based plans resulted in smaller EUD values for 26 out of 33 OARs by an average of 5.6 Gy (range 0.24 to 15 Gy). Owing to more efficient beam segmentation and leaf sequencing tools implemented in the biologically based TPS compared to the dose-based TPS, an estimated treatment delivery time was shorter in most (five out of six) cases with some plans showing up to 50% reduction. The biologically based plans were generally characterized by a smaller conformity index, but greater heterogeneity index compared to the dose-based plans. Overall, compared to plans based on dose-volume optimization, plans with equivalent target coverage obtained using the biologically based TPS demonstrate improved dose distributions for the majority of normal structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19175141     DOI: 10.1118/1.3013556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  30 in total

1.  Investigation of effective decision criteria for multiobjective optimization in IMRT.

Authors:  Clay Holdsworth; Robert D Stewart; Minsun Kim; Jay Liao; Mark H Phillips
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Radiobiologically guided optimisation of the prescription dose and fractionation scheme in radiotherapy using BioSuite.

Authors:  J Uzan; A E Nahum
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy to account for anatomy changes in lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Heng Li; Xiaodong Zhang; Peter Park; Wei Liu; Joe Chang; Zhongxing Liao; Steve Frank; Yupeng Li; Falk Poenisch; Radhe Mohan; Michael Gillin; Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Risk-optimized proton therapy to minimize radiogenic second cancers.

Authors:  Laura A Rechner; John G Eley; Rebecca M Howell; Rui Zhang; Dragan Mirkovic; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Adaptive IMRT using a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm integrated with a diffusion-invasion model of glioblastoma.

Authors:  C H Holdsworth; D Corwin; R D Stewart; R Rockne; A D Trister; K R Swanson; M Phillips
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Homogeneity Index: An objective tool for assessment of conformal radiation treatments.

Authors:  Tejinder Kataria; Kuldeep Sharma; Vikraman Subramani; K P Karrthick; Shyam S Bisht
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2012-10

7.  (Radio)biological optimization of external-beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Alan E Nahum; Julien Uzan
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  A comparison of dose-response characteristics of four NTCP models using outcomes of radiation-induced optic neuropathy and retinopathy.

Authors:  Vitali Moiseenko; William Y Song; Loren K Mell; Niranjan Bhandare
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Integrated-boost IMRT or 3-D-CRT using FET-PET based auto-contoured target volume delineation for glioblastoma multiforme--a dosimetric comparison.

Authors:  Marc D Piroth; Michael Pinkawa; Richard Holy; Gabriele Stoffels; Cengiz Demirel; Charbel Attieh; Hans J Kaiser; Karl J Langen; Michael J Eble
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Different IMRT solutions vs. 3D-conformal radiotherapy in early stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: dosimetric comparison and clinical considerations.

Authors:  Christian Fiandra; Andrea Riccardo Filippi; Paola Catuzzo; Angela Botticella; Patrizia Ciammella; Pierfrancesco Franco; Valeria Casanova Borca; Riccardo Ragona; Santi Tofani; Umberto Ricardi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.